FindAlternative
Back to King Arthur

King Arthur vs MediEvil

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
King Arthur
King ArthurBattle legends on horseback in a photo‑realistic Arthurian adventure.
MediEvil
MediEvilA skeletal knight battles undead hordes to become a true hero.
Overview
Description

Step into the world of the Jerry Bruckheimer film and experience photo‑realistic scenery as you wield the swords of Arthur, Lancelot, Tristan, Bors, or Guinevere. Each hero offers unique attack moves and combos, letting you carve a path through mythic battles. The game blends single‑player story missions with split‑screen multiplayer, featuring horseback combat levels and seamless transitions between cutscenes and gameplay for an immersive adventure.

MediEvil is an action‑adventure title where Sir Daniel Fortesque, a resurrected skeletal knight, journeys across Gallowmere to defeat the sorcerer Zarok. Using a mix of melee, ranged, and quirky weapons, players explore varied levels, collect life bottles, and gather Chalices to unlock the true ending. The game blends platforming, puzzle solving, and hack‑and‑slash combat with a darkly comedic tone, offering single‑player fun on PlayStation 3. Its iconic humor and challenging boss fights have made it a cult classic since its 1998 release.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Hack & Slash
Hack & Slash
Best for
Hack‑and‑slash action fans
Action‑adventure fans
Specifications
General
msrp
$59.99
$29.99−50%
release date
2004-06-11
1998-10-09
Specifications
developer
Konami
SCE Cambridge Studio
publisher
Konami
Sony Computer Entertainment
age rating
ESRB T
PEGI 7, ESRB T
multiplayer
Single player, Split screen
Single player
critic score
53/100
78/100+47%
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Varied character move sets add replay value
  • Stunning photo‑realistic visuals for PS2
  • Engaging horseback combat sections
  • Split‑screen multiplayer enhances party play
  • Varied weapon arsenal with unique mechanics
  • Humorous tone blended with horror elements
  • Rich level design with hidden secrets
  • Memorable protagonist and story
Cons
  • Combat can feel repetitive after extended play
  • Camera angles occasionally hinder visibility
  • Limited depth compared to modern action titles
  • Controls feel dated compared to modern titles
  • Limited camera movement can be restrictive
  • Single‑player only, no co‑op or multiplayer modes
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to King Arthur

View all →
MediEvil
MediEvil

A skeletal knight battles undead hordes to become a true hero.

Compare
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

Battle as Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli through iconic scenes of the first two LOTR films.

Compare
Hercules: The Legendary Journeys
Hercules: The Legendary Journeys

Harness mythic strength, agility, and precision to stop Ares in a 3D adventure

Compare
Darksiders
Darksiders

Unleash the Horsemen in a mythic apocalypse.

Compare

Alternatives to MediEvil

View all →
MediEvil: Resurrection
MediEvil: Resurrection

Resurrected hero battles a dark wizard in a cartoonish PSP adventure

Compare
MediEvil II
MediEvil II

Sir Dan returns to Victorian London to battle undead hordes and a demonic sorcerer.

Compare
Guacamelee!
Guacamelee!

A Mexican‑inspired Metroid‑vania action platformer with melee combat and dimension swapping

Compare
Malice
Malice

Resurrected demi‑goddess battles the Crow Army across fractured worlds

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

MediEvil offers better value and reviews for solo play, while King Arthur adds split‑screen co‑op and horseback combat at a higher cost.

Key differences

  • •King Arthur includes split‑screen multiplayer; MediEvil is single‑player only.
  • •MediEvil costs $29.99 versus King Arthur's $59.99.
  • •Critic scores differ: 78/100 for MediEvil vs 53/100 for King Arthur.
  • •King Arthur features photo‑realistic PS2 graphics and mounted combat; MediEvil uses a more stylized, comedic aesthetic.
  • •MediEvil provides a larger weapon variety and hidden collectibles; King Arthur focuses on five character move sets.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

MediEvil’s varied weapons, hidden secrets and humor earn a higher critic score (78) than King Arthur’s repetitive combat (53).

MediEvil

Platform availability

Platform information not specified for either title in the provided facts.

Tie

Price & value

MediEvil is $29.99, half the price of King Arthur’s $59.99, offering better cost‑to‑content ratio.

MediEvil

Multiplayer / co‑op

King Arthur supports split‑screen multiplayer for two players; MediEvil is single‑player only.

King Arthur

Content & replayability

MediEvil includes secret chalices, hidden items and multiple weapons, encouraging exploration beyond the main story.

MediEvil

Difficulty & accessibility

Both games are rated ESRB T; no specific difficulty metrics are provided.

Tie

Graphics & performance

King Arthur advertises photo‑realistic PS2 visuals and stable frame rate; MediEvil’s graphics are older and stylized.

King Arthur

Choose King Arthur if…

Buy King Arthur if you want split‑screen co‑op and horseback combat and don’t mind a higher price.

Choose MediEvil if…

Buy MediEvil if you prefer single‑player adventure, humor, lower cost and better reviews.

Common questions

Which game is cheaper?

MediEvil costs $29.99; King Arthur costs $59.99.

Is there any multiplayer option?

Only King Arthur offers split‑screen multiplayer; MediEvil is single‑player only.

Which title received better critical reception?

MediEvil has a critic score of 78/100, higher than King Arthur’s 53/100.