FindAlternative
Back to keycloak

keycloak vs miniOrange

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
keycloak
keycloakOpen-source identity and access management for modern applications
Visit
miniOrange
miniOrangeIdentity and access management suite covering SSO, MFA, PAM, and identity governance.
Visit
Overview
Description

Keycloak provides single sign‑on (SSO) and identity brokering for web, mobile, and API‑based applications. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML, allowing seamless integration with existing user stores. The platform includes an admin console, user self‑service, and fine‑grained authorization policies, all available under an Apache 2.0 license. It can be deployed on‑premises or used as a managed service, making it suitable for both startups and large enterprises.

miniOrange is an identity and access management vendor offering single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, privileged access management, identity governance, and data loss prevention under one umbrella. Its SSO connects cloud, mobile, and legacy applications, while its MFA adds adaptive, risk-based controls, and its PAM module covers password vaults and session auditing. Beyond core IAM, miniOrange offers mobile device management for Android, iOS, Windows, and macOS, user lifecycle management from onboarding to offboarding, and CASB capabilities. It integrates with enterprise platforms like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Oracle, and AWS, and ships plugin marketplace add-ons for WordPress, Atlassian, Shopify, Drupal, Joomla, Magento, and Moodle. Pricing for its Centralized SSO and MFA offering starts around $1-3 per user per month depending on tier.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Identity & SSO
Identity & SSO
Best for
Enterprises and developers
IT and security teams needing SSO, MFA, and identity governance across mixed app environments
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
36,057
—
api available
Yes
—
support options
Community forum, GitHub issues, Red Hat support
—
key integrations
LDAP, Active Directory, Kubernetes, Docker, Spring Boot
Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Oracle, AWS, Atlassian
primary language
Java
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open source with no licensing fees
  • Supports all major authentication standards
  • Extensible with custom providers and scripts
  • Strong community and Red Hat enterprise support
  • Published starting price ($1/user/month) is unusually transparent for enterprise IAM
  • Very broad feature set spanning SSO, MFA, PAM, IGA, MDM, and CASB in one vendor
  • Large plugin marketplace for popular CMS and collaboration platforms
  • Recognized by Gartner and G2 with a large stated customer base
Cons
  • Initial setup can be complex for beginners
  • Admin UI may feel dated compared to newer SaaS solutions
  • Self‑hosted scaling requires operational expertise
  • Breadth of modules (IAM, PAM, MDM, DLP) can mean less depth than single-purpose specialists in each area
  • Higher-tier features like passwordless and SCIM require the top pricing tier
  • Enterprise deployments likely still require a sales conversation for exact quotes beyond published starter pricing
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to keycloak

View all →
FusionAuth
FusionAuth

Developer-friendly identity and access management platform

Compare
authentik
authentik

The authentication glue you need

Compare
WorkOS
WorkOS

Enterprise-ready auth, SSO and SCIM APIs for B2B SaaS

Compare
logto
logto

Modern authentication and authorization infrastructure for developers

Compare

Alternatives to miniOrange

View all →
Ping Identity
Ping Identity

Enterprise identity platform combining SSO, MFA, and adaptive authentication.

Compare
Okta
Okta

Enterprise identity and access management platform

Compare
JumpCloud
JumpCloud

Cloud directory platform unifying single sign-on, MFA, and device management for hybrid workforces.

Compare
keycloak
keycloak

Open-source identity and access management for modern applications

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Keycloak is a free, self‑hosted open‑source IAM platform that requires more setup effort, while miniOrange is a paid SaaS offering with broader out‑of‑the‑box features but higher cost.

Key differences

  • •Keycloak is free and self‑hosted; miniOrange is a subscription SaaS.
  • •Keycloak focuses on core SSO, federation, and authorization; miniOrange adds MFA, PAM, IGA, and MDM in one suite.
  • •Keycloak’s admin UI is dated and has a steeper learning curve; miniOrange provides a modern cloud UI with easier onboarding.
  • •Scaling Keycloak needs operational expertise; miniOrange scales automatically as a cloud service.
  • •miniOrange includes a large plugin marketplace and recognized analyst coverage; Keycloak relies on community and Red Hat support.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Keycloak is free open source; miniOrange requires a paid subscription starting at $1 per user/month.

keycloak

Ease of use / learning curve

miniOrange is cloud SaaS with modern UI; Keycloak’s initial setup and admin UI are considered complex and dated.

miniOrange

Features & depth

miniOrange bundles SSO, MFA, PAM, IGA, MDM and CASB; Keycloak provides core SSO, federation, and authorization only.

miniOrange

Integrations & ecosystem

miniOrange offers a large plugin marketplace and many SaaS integrations; Keycloak integrates with LDAP, AD, Kubernetes, Docker, Spring Boot.

miniOrange

Support

Keycloak has community forum, GitHub issues, and optional Red Hat enterprise support; miniOrange’s support details not specified.

keycloak

Scalability

miniOrange scales automatically as SaaS; Keycloak scaling requires self‑hosted infrastructure and expertise.

miniOrange

Security & privacy

Both support major authentication standards; specific security certifications not specified for either.

Tie

Choose keycloak if…

Enterprises with strong ops teams that need a cost‑free, customizable IAM and can manage self‑hosting.

Choose miniOrange if…

Organizations that prefer a turnkey SaaS solution with built‑in MFA, PAM, IGA, and minimal operational overhead.

Common questions

What is the total cost of ownership?

Keycloak has no license fees but requires infrastructure and staff for hosting; miniOrange charges a subscription starting at $1 per user/month.

Can I add multi‑factor authentication?

Keycloak supports MFA via extensions; miniOrange includes adaptive MFA natively as part of its core offering.

How easy is it to integrate with existing LDAP/Active Directory?

Keycloak provides built‑in LDAP and AD federation; miniOrange’s LDAP integration is not specified in the provided facts.