FindAlternative
Back to International Track & Field 2000

International Track & Field 2000 vs World Class Track Meet

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
International Track & Field 2000
International Track & Field 2000Lightning-fast Olympic action for up to four players on Nintendo 64
World Class Track Meet
World Class Track MeetCompete in thrilling athletic events using the Family Fun Fitness Control Mat.
Overview
Description

Experience the thrill of international competition with over a dozen events, from sprinting to weightlifting. Compete solo or with friends in split-screen multiplayer and chase gold in every discipline.

World Class Track Meet is a classic sports video game developed by Human Entertainment and published by Bandai and Nintendo for the Nintendo Entertainment System. Players can test their athletic endurance by running, jumping, and competing in various track and field events. The game offers multiple ways to play, featuring both a Tournament Mode to race against AI runners and an Olympic Mode where participants tackle four distinct events for a cumulative score. Utilizing the Family Fun Fitness Control Mat, players physically step and run to control their on-screen athlete, delivering an engaging and active gaming experience.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Racing & Sports Games
Team Sports
Best for
Casual gamers and sports enthusiasts
Retro gamers and sports fans
Specifications
General
msrp
$29.99
—
release date
1999-12-10
1986-12-23
Specifications
developer
Konami
Human Entertainment
publisher
Konami
Bandai, Nintendo
age rating
ESRB E
—
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer, Split screen
Single player, Multiplayer
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Four-player split-screen fun
  • Wide variety of events
  • Simple, responsive controls
  • High replay value
  • Engaging physical gameplay via the control mat
  • Fun multi-event Olympic Mode structure
  • Competitive tournament mode against AI
  • Memorable electronic scoreboard tracking top scores
Cons
  • Limited to Nintendo 64 hardware
  • Button-mashing can be tiring
  • No online multiplayer
  • Requires the specific Family Fun Fitness Control Mat peripheral
  • Limited to four main events
  • Physically demanding compared to standard controller games
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to International Track & Field 2000

View all →
Olympic Summer Games
Olympic Summer Games

Compete in the 1996 Atlanta Olympics and chase gold glory!

Compare
World Class Track Meet
World Class Track Meet

Compete in thrilling athletic events using the Family Fun Fitness Control Mat.

Compare
Olympic Games: Atlanta 1996
Olympic Games: Atlanta 1996

Compete in the official events of the 1996 Atlanta Summer Olympics.

Compare
Hyper Sports
Hyper Sports

Six fast‑paced Olympic‑style events in one arcade classic

Compare

Alternatives to World Class Track Meet

View all →
Super Mario Kart
Super Mario Kart

Classic SNES kart racing with coins, shells, and split‑screen fun

Compare
Mario Kart: Super Circuit
Mario Kart: Super Circuit

Fast-paced kart racing with 40 tracks and battle mode on the go

Compare
Graham Gooch World Class Cricket
Graham Gooch World Class Cricket

Experience the thrill of cricket with Graham Gooch

Compare
TrackMania United Forever
TrackMania United Forever

Fast‑paced arcade racing with endless custom tracks and multiplayer thrills.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

World Class Track Meet offers a unique physical‑mat experience with fewer events, while International Track & Field 2000 provides many more events, split‑screen multiplayer, and runs on a modern console.

Key differences

  • •Control method: mat‑based physical gameplay vs. standard N64 button mashing.
  • •Number of events: 4 athletic events vs. more than a dozen events.
  • •Multiplayer scope: head‑to‑head AI tournament and limited multiplayer vs. up to four players split‑screen.
  • •Platform: original 1986 hardware (requires Family Fun Fitness Control Mat) vs. Nintendo 64 only.
  • •Graphics: retro 1980s style vs. vibrant, colorful N64 graphics.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

B offers varied button‑mashing events and four‑player split‑screen, increasing immediate fun variety.

International Track & Field 2000

Platform availability

A runs on any system that can use the Family Fun Fitness Control Mat, not limited to a single console.

World Class Track Meet

Price & value

B lists an MSRP of $29.99; A has no price listed, making B’s cost explicit.

International Track & Field 2000

Multiplayer / co‑op

B supports up to four players simultaneously; A only mentions solo and limited multiplayer via the mat.

International Track & Field 2000

Content & replayability

B includes over a dozen events and medal tracking; A has only four events.

International Track & Field 2000

Difficulty & accessibility

A’s physical mat may be less tiring than B’s button‑mashing, but requires specific hardware.

World Class Track Meet

Graphics & performance

B delivers vibrant, colorful N64 graphics; A is a retro 1980s visual style.

International Track & Field 2000

Choose International Track & Field 2000 if…

Buyers seeking many events, easy couch‑co‑op, and a modern console game.

Choose World Class Track Meet if…

Buyers who want a unique physical‑exercise experience and have the required mat.

Common questions

Do I need extra hardware for either game?

A requires the Family Fun Fitness Control Mat; B runs on any Nintendo 64 console with its standard controller.

How many players can play together?

A supports solo and limited multiplayer via the mat; B supports up to four players split‑screen.

Which game offers more variety of events?

B includes more than a dozen distinct athletic events, while A has only four.