GLPI vs Lansweeper
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
GLPI is a free, open-source IT asset management and service desk software. It offers a wide range of features to manage IT assets, track licenses, and provide ITIL-compliant service desk functionalities. GLPI also includes data center management and software auditing capabilities.
Lansweeper is an IT asset management platform that automatically discovers and inventories hardware, software, and network devices across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. It gives IT teams visibility into their infrastructure for tracking assets, managing licenses, and identifying vulnerabilities.
- Free and open-source
- Highly customizable
- ITIL-compliant service desk
- Comprehensive asset management
- Agentless discovery simplifies deployment across large networks
- Free tier available for small environments up to 100 assets
- Strong reporting and compliance visibility features
- Works across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructure
- Steep learning curve
- Limited scalability
- Limited support options
- Outdated user interface
- Pricing scales significantly with asset count at higher tiers
- Enterprise costs can run into tens of thousands annually for large fleets
- Some advanced features require higher-tier plans
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to GLPI
View all →Free, open-source IT asset management software for tracking hardware, licenses, and accessories.
Agentless IT asset discovery and inventory platform for hardware, software, and network devices.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataLansweeper offers a managed SaaS solution with strong agent‑less discovery and reporting but scales costly, while GLPI is a free, open‑source, self‑hosted platform that’s highly customizable but harder to learn and less scalable.
Key differences
- •Deployment model: Lansweeper is cloud/SaaS, GLPI requires self‑hosting; Pricing: Lansweeper freemium then paid per asset, GLPI is free; Ease of use: Lansweeper’s agentless UI is simpler, GLPI has steep learning curve; Scalability: Lansweeper handles large hybrid environments, GLPI limited scalability; Support: Lansweeper implied commercial support, GLPI only community support
Pricing & value
GLPI is free open‑source; Lansweeper’s costs rise sharply with asset count.
Ease of use / learning curve
Lansweeper’s agentless, SaaS UI is simpler; GLPI has steep learning curve.
Features & depth
Lansweeper includes built‑in vulnerability detection and extensive reporting out‑of‑the‑box.
Integrations & ecosystem
GLPI lists LDAP, AD, MySQL integrations; Lansweeper only notes API availability.
Scalability
Lansweeper designed for large on‑prem, cloud, hybrid fleets; GLPI noted limited scalability.
Support
Lansweeper implied commercial support; GLPI limited to community forum and GitHub.
Security & privacy
Lansweeper provides vulnerability tracking; GLPI no specific security features mentioned.
Choose GLPI if…
Small to midsize teams wanting a free, customizable solution and can manage self‑hosting.
Choose Lansweeper if…
Large enterprises needing agentless discovery, robust reporting, and willing to pay for scale.
Common questions
What are the total costs as the asset inventory grows?
Lansweeper charges per asset and can reach tens of thousands annually for large fleets; GLPI remains free regardless of size.
Can I deploy the tool without installing agents on devices?
Yes, Lansweeper discovers assets agentlessly; GLPI’s method isn’t specified, implying traditional agent or manual inventory.
What support options are available if I run into issues?
Lansweeper likely offers commercial support (not detailed); GLPI only provides community forum and GitHub issue tracking.

