FindAlternative
Back to Glances

Glances vs Honeycomb

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Glances
GlancesCross‑platform real‑time system monitoring for admins and DevOps
Honeycomb
HoneycombObservability platform for modern distributed systems
Overview
Description

Glances is an open‑source, cross‑platform monitoring tool that provides a concise, real‑time view of system resources such as CPU, memory, disk I/O, network, and processes. It runs on Linux, Windows, macOS and can be accessed via a web interface, making it ideal for both local and remote monitoring. Designed for system administrators and DevOps teams, Glances aggregates metrics into a single dashboard, supports customizable alerts, and integrates with scripts or APIs for automated workflows. Its lightweight design ensures minimal overhead while delivering comprehensive performance insights.

Honeycomb is an observability platform built around wide structured events and high-cardinality querying, letting engineering teams trace and debug complex production issues in modern distributed systems. It provides a comprehensive view of system performance and behavior, enabling teams to quickly identify and resolve issues.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Monitoring & Logging
Monitoring & Logging
Best for
System Administrators and DevOps teams
Engineering teams and DevOps professionals
Specifications
open source
Yes
No
github stars
33,155
—
api available
No
Yes
support options
Email, GitHub Issues
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Phone Support
key integrations
InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Cassandra, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Docker
Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, GCP, Azure
primary language
Python
—
deployment
—
Cloud/SaaS
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open‑source and free
  • Runs on all major operating systems
  • Lightweight with low resource overhead
  • Extensible via plugins and API
  • Comprehensive system monitoring and performance optimization
  • High-cardinality querying for quick issue resolution
  • Real-time analytics for immediate insights
  • Customizable dashboards for tailored system monitoring
Cons
  • No native mobile app
  • Limited built‑in visualization compared to commercial tools
  • Alerting requires manual configuration or external scripts
  • Steep learning curve for new users
  • Limited support for legacy systems
  • Requires significant resources for large-scale deployments
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Glances

View all →
Grafana
Grafana

Composable observability platform

Compare
netdata
netdata

Real-time system monitoring and performance troubleshooting

Compare
Gatus
Gatus

Self-hosted open-source monitoring and alerting for DevOps teams

Compare
mectrics
mectrics

A free, open-source menu bar app that shows your Mac's CPU, memory, battery, and more.

Compare

Alternatives to Honeycomb

View all →
SkyWalking
SkyWalking

Open-source APM for cloud‑native microservices

Compare
Datadog
Datadog

Unified monitoring, tracing, and log management for modern cloud applications.

Compare
New Relic
New Relic

Full-stack observability platform for modern cloud applications

Compare
OpenObserve
OpenObserve

Open-source observability for logs, metrics and traces

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Glances is a free, open‑source, lightweight monitor that runs everywhere, while Honeycomb is a paid SaaS observability platform with richer analytics and enterprise support.

Key differences

  • •Cost: Glances is free; Honeycomb requires a subscription.
  • •Deployment model: Glances runs locally on any OS; Honeycomb is cloud/SaaS only.
  • •Analytics depth: Honeycomb offers high‑cardinality querying and real‑time analytics; Glances provides basic metric display.
  • •Support: Honeycomb includes 24/7 phone support and live chat; Glances offers only email and GitHub issues.
  • •Extensibility: Glances relies on plugins and a REST API; Honeycomb provides a built‑in API but no plugin system.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Glances is free and open‑source, giving full functionality at zero cost; Honeycomb is a paid subscription.

Glances

Ease of use / learning curve

Glances runs out‑of‑the‑box via CLI/web UI; Honeycomb has a steep learning curve for its advanced queries.

Glances

Features & depth

Honeycomb provides high‑cardinality querying, real‑time analytics, and distributed tracing, which Glances lacks.

Honeycomb

Integrations & ecosystem

Both integrate with Docker; Glances adds many back‑ends (InfluxDB, Prometheus, etc.), Honeycomb focuses on cloud/Kubernetes platforms.

Tie

Collaboration

Honeycomb offers customizable dashboards and SaaS sharing; Glances is primarily a single‑user/local tool.

Honeycomb

Scalability

Honeycomb is designed for large, distributed systems; Glances is lightweight but limited to local or small‑scale monitoring.

Honeycomb

Support

Honeycomb provides email, live chat, and 24/7 phone support; Glances only offers email and GitHub issues.

Honeycomb

Choose Glances if…

Teams needing free, cross‑platform, low‑overhead monitoring with basic alerts.

Choose Honeycomb if…

Organizations that require deep observability, real‑time analytics, and enterprise support for distributed systems.

Common questions

What is the total cost to start using each tool?

Glances is free and open‑source; Honeycomb requires a paid subscription, pricing not specified in the facts.

Can I run the tool on my own servers?

Glances can be installed on Windows, macOS, and Linux; Honeycomb is only offered as a cloud/SaaS service.

Which tool supports advanced querying of high‑cardinality data?

Honeycomb supports high‑cardinality querying and real‑time analytics; Glances provides only basic metric displays.