Gcore vs Quantil (Quantil CDN)
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Gcore provides a worldwide content delivery network with over 210 points of presence and a 200+ Tbps backbone, ensuring rapid content delivery and low latency for users across the globe. The platform offers easy integration, real‑time analytics, and a free starter tier for developers and small sites. Beyond static assets, Gcore supports video streaming, edge computing, and DDoS protection, making it suitable for media companies, SaaS providers, and enterprises that need reliable, high‑performance edge services.
Quantil CDN provides a globally distributed network that caches and serves static assets with low latency. It integrates easily with existing hosting setups and offers real‑time analytics to monitor performance. The service includes built‑in DDoS protection and automatic SSL, making it suitable for developers who need reliable content delivery without complex configuration.
- Extensive global PoP network
- Low average latency
- Integrated DDoS protection
- Generous free tier for testing
- Low latency worldwide
- Free tier for small projects
- Easy integration via DNS CNAME
- Detailed real‑time metrics
- Advanced edge compute requires additional configuration
- Pricing for high traffic can become complex
- Support response times may vary on the free tier
- Limited advanced edge compute features
- Support response times can be slow on free tier
- Pricing can become complex at high bandwidth
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Gcore
View all →
Alternatives to Quantil (Quantil CDN)
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataGcore offers broader global coverage and a higher SLA, making it the safer default; Quantil is simpler and cheaper for low‑traffic projects but has fewer regions and a lower SLA.
Key differences
- •Region footprint: Gcore spans 6 continents; Quantil only North America, Europe, APAC.
- •SLA: Gcore 99.99% vs Quantil 99.95%.
- •Free‑tier bandwidth: Gcore 10 GB/month + 5 TB transfer; Quantil only mentions a free tier without specific limits.
- •Edge compute: Gcore provides configurable edge functions; Quantil offers only basic URL rewrite rules.
- •Network capacity: Gcore advertises 200+ Tbps aggregate; Quantil gives no capacity figure.
Pricing & value
Both are freemium, but Gcore specifies 10 GB/month + 5 TB transfer, giving clearer value; Quantil’s free limits are unspecified.
Uptime & reliability
Gcore SLA 99.99% beats Quantil’s 99.95%.
Performance
Gcore cites 30 ms average latency and 200+ Tbps capacity; Quantil only mentions low latency without numbers.
Developer experience
Gcore offers edge compute, HTTP/2/3, Brotli; Quantil limited to basic rewrites and no modern protocol mention.
Regions & compliance
Gcore covers North America, Europe, Asia, South America, Middle East, Africa; Quantil covers only three regions.
Support
Both note slower response on free tier; no further detail to differentiate.
Lock‑in
Both use DNS CNAME integration; no proprietary APIs or vendor‑specific lock‑in disclosed.
Choose Gcore if…
Enterprises or media platforms requiring global reach, higher SLA, and advanced edge capabilities.
Choose Quantil (Quantil CDN) if…
Small projects or startups needing a simple CDN with a free tier and minimal configuration.
Common questions
Which service gives a higher guaranteed uptime?
Gcore, with a 99.99% SLA, versus Quantil’s 99.95% SLA.
Do both providers support modern protocols like HTTP/3?
Only Gcore explicitly lists HTTP/2, HTTP/3, and Brotli; Quantil does not mention them.
Is there a clear limit on free‑tier bandwidth?
Gcore specifies 10 GB/month and 5 TB total transfer; Quantil’s free tier limits are not detailed.