Farming Simulator 2011 vs Farming Simulator 2013
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Take on the role of a farmer and manage a full‑scale agricultural operation across a sprawling open world. The sequel expands on the original with new crops, equipment, and realistic day‑night cycles. Play solo or join friends in cooperative multiplayer to tackle larger farms, share resources, and compete in seasonal challenges. Available on Linux, PC, and Mac, the game offers a deep simulation experience for both newcomers and seasoned farmers.
Farming Simulator 2013 puts you in charge of a full‑scale farm where you can grow crops, raise animals and handle the business side of agriculture. The game offers a realistic environment with detailed equipment and a variety of tasks to keep you busy. Play solo or team up with friends in multiplayer modes, exploring a large open world across PlayStation 3, PC, Mac and Xbox 360. Whether you prefer strategic planning or hands‑on farming, the title delivers a deep simulation experience.
- Rich variety of crops and equipment
- Supports both single‑player and co‑op multiplayer
- Cross‑platform availability on Linux, PC, and Mac
- Detailed day‑night and weather systems
- Deep agricultural simulation
- Wide variety of equipment
- Multiplayer co‑op options
- Realistic market system
- Graphics are dated compared to newer titles
- Limited mod support on non‑Windows platforms
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Low critic score indicates technical issues
- Graphics are dated compared to modern titles
- Limited mission variety
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Farming Simulator 2011
View all →
Manage a farm on a 4 km² island with realistic tractors and harvesters.

Experience realistic farming on a 4 km² island with dynamic weather and career mode
Alternatives to Farming Simulator 2013
View all →
Experience realistic farming on a 4 km² island with dynamic weather and career mode

Manage a farm on a 4 km² island with realistic tractors and harvesters.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth are one‑time purchase farming sims, but Farming Simulator 2011 offers broader platform support and slightly richer content, while 2013 has a smaller multiplayer group and may be marginally easier for beginners.
Key differences
- •Platform support: 2011 runs on Linux, PC, and Mac; 2013 platform not specified.
- •Multiplayer capacity: 2011 allows up to 4 co‑op players, 2013 up to 3.
- •Content depth: 2011 lists a dynamic 18‑hour day cycle, more crop types and detailed map; 2013 notes limited mission variety.
- •Critic feedback: 2013 has a low critic score (30/100) indicating technical issues; 2011 has no score listed.
- •Learning curve: 2011 is described as having a steep learning curve, whereas 2013’s ease of entry is not noted.
Pricing & value
Both are paid one‑time purchases; no price differences are provided.
Platform availability
2011 explicitly supports Linux, PC, and Mac; 2013 platform details are not specified.
Multiplayer / co‑op
2011 supports up to four friends; 2013 supports up to three.
Content & replayability
2011 mentions a dynamic 18‑hour day cycle, more crop varieties, and a detailed countryside map.
Difficulty & accessibility
2013 has no noted steep learning curve, while 2011 is described as having a steep learning curve for beginners.
Graphics & performance
Both are described as having dated graphics compared to newer titles.
Choose Farming Simulator 2011 if…
Buy if you need cross‑platform play, larger co‑op groups, and richer in‑game systems.
Choose Farming Simulator 2013 if…
Buy if you prefer a slightly simpler entry point and don't need Linux/Mac support.
Common questions
Do either of the games run on Linux?
Only Farming Simulator 2011 lists Linux support; Farming Simulator 2013 does not specify platform compatibility.
Which game supports more players in co‑op mode?
Farming Simulator 2011 supports up to four friends; Farming Simulator 2013 supports up to three.
Is there any indication of technical quality or bugs?
Farming Simulator 2013 has a low critic score (30/100) suggesting technical issues; no critic score is provided for 2011.


