FindAlternative
Back to Facebook Messenger

Facebook Messenger vs Session

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Facebook Messenger
Facebook MessengerConnect with friends and family privately
Session
SessionA decentralized, end-to-end encrypted messenger that needs no phone number or email to use.
Overview
Description

Facebook Messenger is a messaging platform that allows individuals and groups to communicate privately. It offers a range of features, including messaging, voice and video calls, and file sharing.

Session is a private messaging app built and operated by a global community of privacy experts. It uses Account IDs instead of phone numbers or email addresses for signup, encrypts every message with the Session Protocol (built on libsodium), and routes conversations through onion-routed paths across thousands of community-run nodes so no single server can see both the sender and recipient of a message.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Messaging Apps
Messaging Apps
Best for
Individuals and groups
Privacy-conscious individuals, activists, and communities who want encrypted messaging without linki
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Mobile App
open source
No
Yes
api available
No
No
support options
Email, Help Center
Documentation site, FAQ, GitHub issue trackers
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Easy to use and navigate
  • Offers end-to-end encryption for secure messaging
  • Allows for file sharing and group chats
  • Available on multiple platforms
  • No phone number or email required, reducing identity exposure at signup
  • Decentralized onion-routed network avoids reliance on centralized servers
  • Open-source code that can be independently audited
  • Free to use across all supported platforms
Cons
  • May have ads and sponsored content
  • Requires a Facebook account to use
  • May have limitations on free features
  • Decentralized onion routing can introduce more latency than centralized messaging services
  • Lack of phone-number-based contact discovery makes finding contacts less convenient than mainstream messengers
  • Project funding model is tied to the Session Token cryptocurrency, which some users may be wary of
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Facebook Messenger

View all →
WhatsApp
WhatsApp

The world’s most popular messaging app.

Compare
Telegram
Telegram

Fast, cloud-based messaging with big groups and channels.

Compare
Skype
Skype

Retired by Microsoft in May 2025; users are directed to Microsoft Teams.

Compare
Discord
Discord

Voice, video, and text chat for communities.

Compare

Alternatives to Session

View all →
SimpleX Chat
SimpleX Chat

Private messenger with no user IDs, so you own your contacts and groups

Compare
Jami
Jami

Free, peer-to-peer messaging and calling app with no servers and no personal data required.

Compare
Facebook Messenger
Facebook Messenger

Connect with friends and family privately

Compare
Threema
Threema

End-to-end encrypted messaging that never requires a phone number

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Session offers a fully free, open‑source, decentralized messenger with strong privacy but higher latency and limited contact discovery; Messenger is easier, richer in features, but requires a Facebook account, shows ads, and isn’t open source.

Key differences

  • •Identity requirement: Session uses an Account ID, Messenger needs a Facebook account.
  • •Architecture: Session runs on a decentralized onion‑routed network; Messenger is a centralized cloud service.
  • •Privacy: Session is end‑to‑end encrypted and open source; Messenger’s encryption is optional and the code is closed.
  • •Feature set: Messenger includes voice/video calls, stickers, GIFs and larger group limits; Session focuses on text and basic group chats.
  • •Cost model: Both are free, but Session’s funding ties to a cryptocurrency token, which may affect perception.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free, but Session adds no hidden ads or paid tiers, giving pure cost‑free value.

Session

Ease of use / learning curve

Messenger leverages familiar Facebook login and UI, making onboarding quicker for most users.

Facebook Messenger

Features & depth

Messenger provides voice/video calls, stickers, GIFs, larger groups (250) and web access; Session offers only text and limited group size.

Facebook Messenger

Integrations & ecosystem

Messenger integrates with Facebook’s social graph and many third‑party apps; Session has no API or ecosystem.

Facebook Messenger

Security & privacy

Session is fully end‑to‑end encrypted, open source, and requires no personal identifiers; Messenger’s encryption is optional and code is closed.

Session

Support

Messenger offers email and a Help Center; Session only provides documentation, FAQ, and GitHub issue tracking.

Facebook Messenger

Scalability / performance

Messenger’s centralized cloud delivers low latency; Session’s onion‑routing can be slower.

Facebook Messenger

Choose Facebook Messenger if…

General consumers who want a feature‑rich, low‑latency chat integrated with Facebook and don’t mind ads.

Choose Session if…

Privacy‑focused users, activists, or anyone avoiding personal identifiers and willing to accept slower performance.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either app?

Both are free to download and use; Session has no ads, while Messenger may show sponsored content.

Can I call or video chat with Session?

Not specified; Session’s listed features only mention text messaging and group chats.

Do I need to provide a phone number or email to sign up?

Session uses an Account ID only; Messenger requires a Facebook account, which typically uses an email or phone number.