FindAlternative
Back to Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)

Equinix Metal (formerly Packet) vs Vultr

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)
Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)Bare metal servers on demand with instant provisioning
Vultr
VultrHigh-performance cloud compute and bare metal hosting worldwide.
Overview
Description

Equinix Metal provides automated, on‑demand bare metal infrastructure that can be deployed in seconds across global data centers. It combines the performance of dedicated hardware with the flexibility of cloud APIs, allowing developers to run any workload without virtualization overhead. The platform integrates with major cloud providers and orchestration tools, offering programmable networking, IPMI access, and a pay‑as‑you‑go pricing model. It is ideal for latency‑sensitive applications, high‑performance computing, and workloads that require full control over the hardware stack.

Vultr is a global cloud hosting provider offering high-performance SSD cloud servers, bare metal, and dedicated GPU instances. Designed for developers and enterprises, the platform enables users to deploy infrastructure in seconds across dozens of global locations. The service provides powerful APIs, automated backups, and flexible networking options, empowering teams to scale applications effortlessly. With transparent hourly and monthly billing, Vultr delivers enterprise-grade infrastructure without the complexity of legacy cloud providers.

Pricing
—
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Cloud Compute
Cloud Compute
Best for
Enterprises and developers needing dedicated hardware
Developers, startups, and growing tech teams
Specifications
free tier
No
No
uptime sla
99.99%
99.99%
datacenter regions
US, Canada, EU, APAC
30+ locations worldwide (North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, South America)
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • True bare metal performance without hypervisor overhead
  • Global data center footprint for low latency
  • Extensive API and IaC support
  • Pay‑as‑you‑go pricing with per‑hour billing
  • Extensive global data center coverage
  • Simple and transparent hourly pricing
  • High-performance SSD and NVMe storage
  • Robust API and developer tooling
Cons
  • Higher cost compared to shared cloud VMs for small workloads
  • Limited managed services; requires more ops expertise
  • No free tier for long‑term testing
  • Limited built-in managed services compared to major hyperscalers
  • Support response times can be slower on basic tiers
  • Advanced networking features require technical configuration
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)

View all →
Leaseweb
Leaseweb

Global bare-metal and dedicated servers backed by a massive owned network.

Compare
Vultr
Vultr

High-performance cloud compute and bare metal hosting worldwide.

Compare
phoenixNAP
phoenixNAP

Global bare metal cloud and dedicated server infrastructure

Compare
Hivelocity
Hivelocity

Bare-metal dedicated servers and colocation hosting

Compare

Alternatives to Vultr

View all →
Linode
Linode

Reliable and high-performance cloud hosting solutions for developers and businesses.

Compare
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud

Empowering global businesses with scalable, secure, and reliable cloud computing solutions.

Compare
OpenStack
OpenStack

Open source cloud computing infrastructure software for building private and public clouds.

Compare
Hetzner Cloud
Hetzner Cloud

Low-cost European cloud VPS instances

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Vultr is the safer default for most developers and startups needing flexible cloud VMs and GPU options at lower cost, while Equinix Metal is best for enterprises that require true bare‑metal performance and deep hardware control.

Key differences

  • •Vultr offers cloud VMs, SSD/NVMe storage and GPU instances; Equinix Metal provides only bare‑metal servers.
  • •Vultr has 30+ global data‑center locations; Equinix Metal lists regions but fewer specific sites.
  • •Pricing model: Vultr uses simple hourly rates with transparent subscription; Equinix Metal uses per‑hour pay‑as‑you‑go and is noted as higher cost for small workloads.
  • •Vultr includes built‑in DDoS mitigation and firewall; Equinix Metal focuses on out‑of‑band management and custom networking (BGP, VLAN).
  • •Developer tooling: both have robust APIs and Terraform support, but Vultr also markets startup scripts and custom images.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Vultr provides simple hourly pricing; Equinix Metal is described as higher cost for small workloads.

Vultr

Uptime & reliability

Both guarantee a 99.99% SLA.

Tie

Performance

Equinix Metal offers true bare‑metal performance without hypervisor overhead.

Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)

Developer experience

Both expose extensive APIs and Terraform providers for automated provisioning.

Tie

Regions & compliance

Vultr lists 30+ specific locations worldwide; Equinix Metal lists broader regions only.

Vultr

Support

Support details are not specified for either product.

Tie

Lock‑in

Both use proprietary platforms; no evidence of differing lock‑in risk.

Tie

Choose Equinix Metal (formerly Packet) if…

Enterprises or teams that require dedicated bare‑metal servers, custom networking, and hybrid edge deployments.

Choose Vultr if…

Startups, developers, or small teams needing flexible VMs, GPU workloads, and lower‑cost hourly pricing.

Common questions

Which service is cheaper for a small, short‑term test environment?

Vultr’s simple hourly pricing is positioned as lower cost; Equinix Metal is noted as higher cost for small workloads.

Do both providers support infrastructure‑as‑code?

Yes, both offer robust APIs and Terraform providers for automated provisioning.

Can I run GPU‑intensive workloads on Equinix Metal?

GPU instances are listed as a key feature of Vultr; Equinix Metal does not mention GPU support.