Duke Nukel Advance vs Duke Nukem: Time to Kill
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Alien scientists plot to take over Earth, and it's up to Duke Nukem to stop their evil science project. Using his full arsenal of weapons, Duke teleports to various locations around the world to confront the alien menace. The game blends classic shooter action with sci‑fi storytelling, offering both single‑player and multiplayer modes for endless alien‑slaying fun.
Duke Nukem: Time to Kill is a third‑person shooter that puts the iconic anti‑hero in a time‑traveling adventure. Developed by n‑Space for the PlayStation, the game delivers classic Duke attitude with hardcore action, exploration, and comedic sci‑fi flair. The title features both single‑player missions and split‑screen multiplayer deathmatch, letting players battle friends in fast‑paced, over‑the‑top combat across varied eras.
- Exciting teleportation mechanic adds variety.
- Robust weapon selection keeps combat fresh.
- Humorous writing captures the Duke Nukem spirit.
- Multiplayer adds replay value.
- Fresh third‑person perspective for the Duke series
- Local split‑screen multiplayer adds replay value
- Varied time‑travel themed levels keep gameplay interesting
- Signature Duke humor and attitude throughout
- Graphics are dated by modern standards.
- Limited platform availability.
- Multiplayer can feel uneven without a large player base.
- Limited to PlayStation hardware, no modern ports
- Multiplayer only supports two players locally
- Graphics are dated by today's standards
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Duke Nukel Advance
View all →
Alternatives to Duke Nukem: Time to Kill
View all →
Duke battles alien scientists across the globe with guns and teleportation.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataDuke Nukem: Time to Kill offers a pricier, PS‑only third‑person experience with local split‑screen multiplayer, while Duke Nukem Advance is cheaper, slightly newer, and includes broader teleportation gameplay but lacks split‑screen.
Key differences
- •Perspective: A is third‑person, B is likely traditional (unspecified but implied first‑person).
- •Multiplayer: A supports local split‑screen deathmatch for two players; B offers multiplayer deathmatch without split‑screen.
- •Price: A costs $49.99; B costs $29.99.
- •Age rating: A is ESRB M (17+); B is ESRB T (13+).
- •Release era: A released 1998 on PlayStation only; B released 2002 with limited platform availability.
Gameplay & fun factor
A adds a fresh third‑person view and time‑travel themed levels, expanding Duke’s usual formula.
Platform availability
B’s platform limits are unspecified but likely broader than A’s PlayStation‑only release.
Price & value
B is $20 cheaper ($29.99 vs $49.99) offering lower entry cost.
Multiplayer / co‑op
A provides local split‑screen for two players, a feature B lacks.
Content & replayability
A’s varied time‑period levels and split‑screen mode give more replay hooks than B’s standard deathmatch.
Graphics & performance
Both are described as having dated graphics by modern standards.
Choose Duke Nukel Advance if…
Buy B if you prefer a lower cost, slightly newer game, and can play without split‑screen.
Choose Duke Nukem: Time to Kill if…
Buy A if you want third‑person Duke action, local couch co‑op, and don’t mind a higher price.
Common questions
Which game is cheaper?
Duke Nukem Advance costs $29.99, while Duke Nukem: Time to Kill costs $49.99.
Do either of the games support online multiplayer?
Neither description mentions online play; A only has local split‑screen, B only lists multiplayer without specifying online.
What age rating should I consider?
Time to Kill is ESRB M (17+); Duke Nukem Advance is ESRB T (13+).