FindAlternative
Back to delivery-tracker

delivery-tracker vs fleetbase

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
delivery-tracker
delivery-trackerDelivery and shipment tracking API for Korean, Japanese and Chinese carriers
fleetbase
fleetbaseAn open-source modular logistics and supply chain operating system.
Overview
Description

Delivery Tracker is an open-source delivery and shipment tracking service that developers integrate into their own applications. It exposes a GraphQL Tracking API, a Carrier List API and a webhook API that posts status changes to a callback URL, alongside client SDKs. It covers carriers in South Korea, Japan, China and Germany, including CJ Logistics, Korea Post, Coupang Logistics, Yamato, Sagawa, Japan Post, Cainiao Global and DHL. The Core can be self-hosted with Docker, and a managed cloud service offers a free plan plus paid Pro, Business and Enterprise tiers.

Fleetbase is a flexible, open-source logistics operating system designed to build and scale delivery, fulfillment, and transportation operations. It provides developers and enterprises with the core infrastructure needed to manage fleets, track shipments, and coordinate last-mile delivery workflows. Built with a modular architecture, the platform allows organizations to self-host their logistics infrastructure or use cloud services, avoiding per-driver fees and maintaining full data ownership. It integrates seamlessly with custom applications through robust APIs and extensible plugins.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Free
Category
API Tools
ERP Systems
Best for
Developers integrating delivery tracking into their own applications
Logistics operators and developers
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
676
2,325+244%
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email
Community support, documentation, and paid enterprise support
primary language
TypeScript
JavaScript
key integrations
—
Webhooks, REST APIs, custom plugins
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Easy to use and navigate
  • Real-time updates and notifications
  • Supports multiple carriers
  • Free plan available, plus a self-hostable Core that is free under its licence
  • Open-source with no per-driver licensing fees
  • Extremely modular and customizable architecture
  • Supports self-hosted deployment for data privacy
  • Robust API-first design for custom integrations
Cons
  • Limited features compared to paid services
  • No option for advanced tracking or analytics
  • Limited customer support
  • Requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
  • Self-hosting demands independent server management
  • Smaller community ecosystem compared to proprietary alternatives
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to delivery-tracker

View all →
fleetbase
fleetbase

An open-source modular logistics and supply chain operating system.

Compare

Alternatives to fleetbase

View all →
delivery-tracker
delivery-tracker

Delivery and shipment tracking API for Korean, Japanese and Chinese carriers

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Delivery‑tracker is a focused, easy‑to‑use shipment‑tracking API with a free tier; Fleetbase is a full‑stack, open‑source logistics platform that requires more setup and expertise.

Key differences

  • •Scope: delivery‑tracker only tracks parcels; Fleetbase manages fleets, drivers, routing, and inventory.
  • •Deployment effort: delivery‑tracker offers a hosted free plan and a self‑hostable core; Fleetbase must be self‑hosted entirely.
  • •Community size: Fleetbase has 2,325 GitHub stars vs. delivery‑tracker’s 676, indicating a larger ecosystem.
  • •Support model: delivery‑tracker provides email support only; Fleetbase offers community help plus optional paid enterprise support.
  • •Pricing structure: delivery‑tracker uses a freemium model with paid tiers; Fleetbase is free but may incur hosting costs.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Delivery‑tracker offers a freemium cloud plan and free self‑hostable core; Fleetbase is free but requires self‑hosting infrastructure costs.

delivery-tracker

Ease of use / learning curve

Delivery‑tracker provides a ready‑to‑use API and web console; Fleetbase needs full deployment and technical expertise.

delivery-tracker

Features & depth

Fleetbase includes fleet management, driver dispatch, routing, inventory, and modular plugins; delivery‑tracker focuses solely on parcel tracking.

fleetbase

Integrations & ecosystem

Fleetbase lists webhooks, REST APIs, custom plugins and has a larger GitHub community; delivery‑tracker mentions carrier list API and webhook only.

fleetbase

Support

Fleetbase offers community resources plus optional paid enterprise support; delivery‑tracker only lists email support.

fleetbase

Security & privacy

Both are open‑source and self‑hostable, giving comparable control over data privacy.

Tie

Scalability

Fleetbase’s modular architecture is designed for large fleet operations; delivery‑tracker’s free cloud tier may limit high‑volume use.

fleetbase

Choose delivery-tracker if…

Developers needing quick parcel‑tracking integration with minimal setup.

Choose fleetbase if…

Logistics teams that require full fleet, driver, and inventory management and can handle self‑hosting.

Common questions

Can I start without self‑hosting?

Yes, delivery‑tracker offers a free cloud plan; Fleetbase requires self‑hosting from the start.

Which product supports multiple carriers internationally?

Delivery‑tracker supports carriers in Korea, Japan, China, Germany and more; Fleetbase focuses on fleet operations, not carrier tracking.

What support is available if I run into issues?

Delivery‑tracker provides email support only; Fleetbase offers community forums, documentation, and optional paid enterprise support.