DeepSource vs Greptile
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
DeepSource is an automated code review platform that combines static analysis with AI agents to catch security vulnerabilities and quality issues, aiming to reduce false positives compared to traditional linters. It reviews pull requests inline using more than 5,000 deterministic rules plus AI analysis, and its Autofix feature generates pre-verified patches for detected issues. The platform also scans for exposed secrets across 165+ provider types, checks open-source dependencies for vulnerabilities with reachability analysis, tracks code coverage thresholds, and reviews Infrastructure-as-Code files such as Terraform and CloudFormation. DeepSource integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, and offers an MCP server for AI coding agent integration.
Greptile is an AI-powered code review tool that builds a graph index of an entire codebase, mapping files, functions and dependencies, then deploys multiple review agents in parallel to check pull requests for bugs, security issues and style violations. It continuously learns from a team's own PR comments to apply house coding standards automatically. Greptile also includes TREX, a testing agent that autonomously writes and runs tests for a given PR, and supports custom rules written in plain English. It integrates with GitHub and GitLab, plugs into coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Devin, and offers a self-hosted, SOC 2-compliant option for enterprise security requirements.
- Free tier for unlimited public repositories
- Combines static analysis with AI to reduce false positives
- Broad secrets and IaC scanning coverage
- BYOK option for enterprise AI review
- Free Starter tier covers a solo developer with unlimited repositories
- Whole-codebase graph indexing gives reviews more context than diff-only tools
- TREX can generate and run tests automatically instead of just flagging missing coverage
- Plain-English custom rules are easier to set up than a rules DSL
- Team plan AI Review credit may run out for heavy usage
- Enterprise pricing not published
- Self-hosted deployment limited to Enterprise tier
- Credit-based Pro pricing means heavy TREX usage (3 credits per review) can burn through the allotment fast
- Full language accuracy is strongest on a defined set of languages, with reduced accuracy on others
- Self-hosted deployment likely requires an Enterprise conversation not detailed publicly
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to DeepSource
View all →
Code quality and security platform with AI guardrails for pull requests and AI-generated code.
AI code review platform that triages, reviews and security-scans every pull request.
Alternatives to Greptile
View all →AI code review platform that triages, reviews and security-scans every pull request.
AI-powered code review platform combining static analysis with automated pull request fixes.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataDeepSource offers broader static analysis and secret scanning out‑of‑the‑box, while Greptile provides whole‑codebase graph indexing and AI‑generated tests; choose based on whether you need comprehensive security checks or richer contextual reviews.
Key differences
- •DeepSource includes built‑in secrets detection for 165+ credential types and IaC scanning; Greptile does not list such coverage.
- •Greptile builds a graph index of the entire codebase and can auto‑generate tests (TREX); DeepSource focuses on deterministic rule fixes.
- •DeepSource’s free tier supports unlimited public repos; Greptile’s free tier is limited to a solo developer but unlimited repos.
Pricing & value
Both are freemium, but DeepSource’s free tier covers unlimited public repos for teams; Greptile’s free tier is solo‑dev only.
Ease of use / learning curve
Greptile’s plain‑English custom rules and graph indexing reduce setup complexity versus DeepSource’s rule‑based system.
Features & depth
DeepSource provides extensive secret detection, IaC scanning, coverage enforcement, and an MCP server; Greptile lacks these specific features.
Integrations & ecosystem
Greptile integrates with AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) and offers a self‑hosted SOC 2 option; DeepSource lists only standard VCS integrations.
Collaboration
DeepSource generates pre‑verified autofix patches directly in PRs, streamlining team workflow; Greptile focuses on review agents and test generation.
Scalability
DeepSource scans entire codebases beyond diffs and supports enterprise‑grade AI credits; Greptile’s credit‑based model can limit heavy TREX usage.
Security & privacy
Greptile offers a self‑hosted, SOC 2‑compliant deployment; DeepSource’s self‑hosted option is limited to Enterprise tier and not detailed.
Choose DeepSource if…
Teams needing built‑in secret, IaC, and coverage enforcement with unlimited public repo support.
Choose Greptile if…
Teams that value whole‑codebase context, AI‑generated tests, and SOC 2‑compliant self‑hosting.
Common questions
Can I run these tools on private repositories for free?
DeepSource’s free tier is unlimited for public repos only; private repo support requires paid plans. Greptile’s free tier is solo‑dev only, also limited to public repos.
Which tool offers automated test generation?
Greptile includes TREX, an agent that writes and runs tests automatically; DeepSource does not provide test generation.
Do either of these products support self‑hosted deployments?
DeepSource offers self‑hosting only for Enterprise customers (not publicly detailed). Greptile provides a self‑hosted, SOC 2‑compliant option, but details require an enterprise conversation.