FindAlternative
Back to croc

croc vs ToffeeShare

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
croc
crocSecure, fast file transfers from the command line
ToffeeShare
ToffeeSharePeer-to-peer file transfer with no size limits and nothing stored on servers
Overview
Description

croc is an open-source command-line tool that lets you quickly and safely transfer files and folders between devices without needing a central server. It uses end‑to‑end encryption and works across Windows, macOS, Linux, and the web, making it ideal for developers and power users who need a reliable way to share data. The tool is self‑hosted, free to use, and integrates with existing workflows via simple commands and scripts. With minimal configuration, croc handles large files, streams data in real time, and provides clear progress feedback, all while keeping your transfers private.

ToffeeShare is a free, privacy-focused peer-to-peer file transfer service that sends files directly between a sender's and receiver's devices over WebRTC, with no cloud storage involved. Because there is no size limit tied to server storage, users can transfer very large files, and everything becomes inaccessible the moment the browser tab is closed.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Large File Transfer
P2P File Sharing
Best for
Developers and power users
Individuals and businesses who need to send large or sensitive files directly between devices withou
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
38,172
—
api available
No
No
support options
Email, GitHub Issues
Email support via contact page
primary language
Go
—
key integrations
—
WebRTC
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open‑source
  • End‑to‑end encryption by default
  • Works on all major OSes
  • Simple single‑command usage
  • No file size limit since nothing is stored centrally
  • End-to-end encrypted transfers
  • No account or software installation required for web use
  • Completely free
Cons
  • Requires both parties to have croc installed
  • Relay server may add latency if self‑hosted
  • Limited GUI; primarily command‑line based
  • Both sender and receiver must be online at the same time
  • Transfer speed depends on both parties' network connections
  • No persistent storage, so files can't be retrieved later
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to croc

View all →
copyparty
copyparty

Self‑hosted, peer‑to‑peer file sharing for developers and power users

Compare
rclone
rclone

Sync and manage files across cloud storage from the command line

Compare
LocalSend
LocalSend

Fast, secure file sharing across your local network

Compare
Signiant
Signiant

Fast, secure file transfer software for large media assets.

Compare

Alternatives to ToffeeShare

View all →
SendAnywhere
SendAnywhere

Share any file instantly across all your devices for free

Compare
dashbeam
dashbeam

Send files and folders anywhere without cloud storage

Compare
croc
croc

Secure, fast file transfers from the command line

Compare
LocalSend
LocalSend

Fast, secure file sharing across your local network

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

croc offers free, open‑source, command‑line file transfers with built‑in AES‑256 encryption and optional self‑hosted relay, while ToffeeShare provides a browser‑based, zero‑install P2P transfer with no size limits but requires both parties online.

Key differences

  • •croc requires installation on both ends; ToffeeShare works via a web page with optional app.
  • •croc can run in a self‑hosted relay mode; ToffeeShare is a cloud/SaaS service.
  • •croc is open‑source (Go) with GitHub support; ToffeeShare is closed‑source with email support only.
  • •croc supports resumable transfers and scripting; ToffeeShare has no resumable or API features.
  • •ToffeeShare imposes no file‑size limits; croc’s limits are not specified but typical CLI tools may have practical limits.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

croc is free and open‑source; ToffeeShare is also free but closed‑source, no cost difference.

croc

Ease of use / learning curve

ToffeeShare works in a browser with no installation, whereas croc requires command‑line knowledge and installation on both sides.

ToffeeShare

Features & depth

croc offers resumable transfers, script/CI integration, and optional password protection; ToffeeShare lacks these.

croc

Integrations & ecosystem

croc provides API‑free but scriptable CLI and GitHub integration; ToffeeShare has no API and limited integrations.

croc

Security & privacy

Both use end‑to‑end encryption (croc AES‑256, ToffeeShare DTLS 1.3); deployment differs (self‑hosted vs cloud).

Tie

Support

croc offers GitHub Issues and email; ToffeeShare only email via contact page.

croc

Scalability / deployment

ToffeeShare’s cloud SaaS scales automatically; croc relies on self‑hosted relay which may need provisioning.

ToffeeShare

Choose croc if…

Developers or teams needing scriptable, secure transfers with self‑hosted control.

Choose ToffeeShare if…

Users who want instant, no‑install transfers of any size and can keep both parties online.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either tool?

Both are free; croc is open‑source, ToffeeShare is a free SaaS offering.

Do I need to install software on the receiver’s machine?

croc requires installation on both ends; ToffeeShare works via a web browser without installation.

Can I resume a transfer if it is interrupted?

croc supports resumable transfers; ToffeeShare does not provide resumable capability.