Counter Action vs Men of War: Assault Squad
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Counter Action puts you in the boots of a WWII commander, letting you direct infantry, tanks, and artillery in fast‑paced real‑time battles. Developed by Russia’s Nashi Igry and released in 1996, the game blends strategic depth with historical settings for both solo and multiplayer skirmishes.
Men of War: Assault Squad delivers a gritty World War II experience, letting players command infantry, armor, and air units in detailed, destructible environments. The game blends real‑time strategy with direct control, offering both solo campaigns and robust multiplayer modes. With a focus on tactical depth and realistic combat physics, players can execute coordinated assaults, manage resources, and adapt to dynamic battlefields across a variety of historical scenarios.
- Deep tactical gameplay
- Authentic WWII units and settings
- Robust multiplayer support
- Extensive modding and scenario tools
- Deep tactical control
- Highly destructible environments
- Strong multiplayer variety
- Robust modding support
- Outdated graphics by modern standards
- Limited platform availability (PC only)
- Steep learning curve for newcomers
- Steep learning curve for newcomers
- Limited UI polish
- Occasional performance issues on older PCs
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Counter Action
View all →Alternatives to Men of War: Assault Squad
View all →
Command tanks and troops in the pivotal WWII Kharkov Defence Operation.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataMen of War: Assault Squad offers a more modern, feature‑rich experience with co‑op and larger multiplayer, while Counter Action is an older, graphics‑limited title.
Key differences
- •Assault Squad supports up to 16‑player multiplayer and cooperative campaign; Counter Action only head‑to‑head LAN matches.
- •Assault Squad includes fully destructible environments and direct control of individual units; Counter Action lacks destructibility.
- •Release dates differ dramatically (2011 vs 1996), giving Assault Squad newer graphics and engine.
- •Both cost $29.99, but Assault Squad’s newer tech may demand more recent hardware.
- •Both have steep learning curves, but Assault Squad’s UI is noted as less polished.
Gameplay & fun factor
Assault Squad adds direct unit control, realistic ballistics and destructible terrain, enhancing tactical depth.
Platform availability
Both are PC‑only titles; no other platforms are listed.
Pricing & value
Both are priced at $29.99 with one‑time purchase.
Multiplayer / co‑op
Assault Squad offers up to 16 players and co‑op campaign; Counter Action only supports head‑to‑head LAN.
Content & replayability
Assault Squad provides a single‑player campaign, co‑op, extensive mod tools and destructible maps.
Difficulty & accessibility
Both list a steep learning curve for newcomers.
Graphics & performance
Assault Squad (2011) uses newer graphics; Counter Action (1996) is noted as outdated.
Choose Counter Action if…
Players seeking a retro WWII RTS experience and are okay with dated graphics.
Choose Men of War: Assault Squad if…
Players wanting modern WWII RTS with co‑op, large multiplayer, and richer tactical features.
Common questions
Is there a price difference between the two games?
No, both are priced at $29.99 as a one‑time purchase.
Which game supports cooperative play?
Men of War: Assault Squad includes co‑op campaign play; Counter Action does not.
Do the games run on modern PCs?
Assault Squad runs on modern PCs but may have performance issues on older hardware; Counter Action’s graphics are outdated but runs on any PC that can handle 1996 software.







