code-review-graph vs Greptile
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Code-review-graph is a local-first code intelligence graph designed for efficient code reviews. It builds a persistent map of your codebase, allowing AI coding tools to focus on what matters. This results in benchmarked context reductions on reviews and large-repo workflows. By optimizing the code review process, developers can work more efficiently and effectively.
Greptile is an AI-powered code review tool that builds a graph index of an entire codebase, mapping files, functions and dependencies, then deploys multiple review agents in parallel to check pull requests for bugs, security issues and style violations. It continuously learns from a team's own PR comments to apply house coding standards automatically. Greptile also includes TREX, a testing agent that autonomously writes and runs tests for a given PR, and supports custom rules written in plain English. It integrates with GitHub and GitLab, plugs into coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Devin, and offers a self-hosted, SOC 2-compliant option for enterprise security requirements.
- Efficient code reviews and reduced context
- AI-powered code intelligence for focused development
- Local-first approach for reduced reliance on cloud services
- Scalable solution for large codebases
- Free Starter tier covers a solo developer with unlimited repositories
- Whole-codebase graph indexing gives reviews more context than diff-only tools
- TREX can generate and run tests automatically instead of just flagging missing coverage
- Plain-English custom rules are easier to set up than a rules DSL
- Limited platform support
- Steep learning curve for new users
- Limited customization options
- Credit-based Pro pricing means heavy TREX usage (3 credits per review) can burn through the allotment fast
- Full language accuracy is strongest on a defined set of languages, with reduced accuracy on others
- Self-hosted deployment likely requires an Enterprise conversation not detailed publicly
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to code-review-graph
View all →Alternatives to Greptile
View all →AI code review platform that triages, reviews and security-scans every pull request.
AI-powered code review platform combining static analysis with automated pull request fixes.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataGreptile offers a richer, AI‑driven review experience with test generation and custom plain‑English rules, but costs credits and may need enterprise talks; code‑review‑graph is free, open‑source, and runs locally but provides fewer advanced features.
Key differences
- •Greptile includes AI agents that generate and run tests (TREX) and learns from past PR comments; code‑review‑graph does not offer test generation.
- •Greptile provides a freemium model with paid credits for heavy usage, while code‑review‑graph is completely free and open‑source.
- •Greptile integrates with multiple AI coding assistants (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) and offers a self‑hosted SOC 2 option; code‑review‑graph is self‑hosted only with limited platform support.
- •Custom review rules in Greptile can be written in plain English; code‑review‑graph offers limited customization.
Pricing & value
Greptile has a freemium tier but heavy usage consumes credits; code‑review‑graph is free but lacks advanced AI features.
Ease of use / learning curve
code‑review‑graph’s local‑first setup is simple for developers; Greptile’s swarm agents and custom rules add complexity.
Features & depth
Greptile provides whole‑codebase graph, AI test generation, learning from PR history, and plain‑English rules.
Integrations & ecosystem
Greptile integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and more; code‑review‑graph lists only CLI/MCP.
Collaboration
Greptile’s AI agents and automated test feedback support team‑wide code quality; code‑review‑graph focuses on individual efficiency.
Scalability
code‑review‑graph is designed for large repos with a persistent local map; Greptile’s credit model may limit heavy usage.
Support & security
Greptile offers documentation, self‑hosted SOC 2 option, and enterprise support; code‑review‑graph relies on community Discord.
Choose code-review-graph if…
Developers or small teams preferring a free, open‑source, locally hosted solution with minimal cloud reliance.
Choose Greptile if…
Engineering teams needing AI‑driven, whole‑codebase reviews, automated test generation, and enterprise‑grade security.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Greptile offers a free starter tier but charges credits for heavy AI usage; code‑review‑graph is completely free.
Can I run the tool on‑premises for data privacy?
Greptile provides a self‑hosted, SOC 2‑compliant option (enterprise discussion required); code‑review‑graph is self‑hosted by default.
Do either tools generate tests automatically?
Only Greptile includes the TREX agent that writes and runs tests; code‑review‑graph does not provide test generation.
