FindAlternative
Back to Cisco Umbrella

Cisco Umbrella vs Zscaler Internet Access

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco UmbrellaCloud‑delivered DNS security that blocks threats before they reach users
Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet AccessSecure, fast internet and SaaS access for any user, any device.
Overview
Description

Cisco Umbrella provides a cloud‑based first line of defense that secures internet access for users wherever they go. By leveraging DNS, secure web gateway, and cloud‑delivered firewall capabilities, it blocks malicious domains, IPs, and files before they can compromise devices. The service integrates with existing network infrastructure and offers real‑time visibility, policy enforcement, and detailed reporting, helping organizations reduce risk and simplify security operations across distributed workforces.

Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) is a cloud‑native secure web gateway that protects users from threats on the internet and SaaS applications. It inspects traffic inline, enforces policy, and leverages AI to block malware, ransomware, and data loss. Delivered as a global SaaS service, ZIA scales instantly, requires no on‑prem hardware, and integrates with identity providers and CASB solutions to give organizations consistent security regardless of location or device.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Firewalls
Firewalls
Best for
Enterprises and distributed teams
Enterprises and mid‑market organizations
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Live Chat, Phone, 24/7 Support
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Phone
key integrations
Cisco SecureX, Microsoft Azure AD, Okta, Splunk, ServiceNow
Microsoft 365, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Broad DNS and web‑gateway coverage
  • Fast, cloud‑native deployment
  • Rich threat intelligence feed
  • Scalable for large enterprises
  • Fully cloud‑native, no on‑prem hardware required.
  • Scales instantly to support global user bases.
  • Deep SSL inspection with minimal performance impact.
  • Extensive integrations with identity and CASB platforms.
Cons
  • Limited on‑premise customization
  • Higher cost for advanced tiers
  • Complex policy UI for beginners
  • Dependent on internet connectivity for policy enforcement.
  • Complex policy configuration may require specialist expertise.
  • Higher cost for large enterprises compared to basic firewalls.
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cisco Umbrella

View all →
Cloudflare
Cloudflare

CDN, security, and edge platform for the internet.

Compare
Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access

Secure, fast internet and SaaS access for any user, any device.

Compare
DNSFilter
DNSFilter

AI-powered DNS threat protection and content filtering for businesses, schools, and MSPs.

Compare
Control D
Control D

DNS Filtering for Every OS

Compare

Alternatives to Zscaler Internet Access

View all →
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Umbrella

Cloud‑delivered DNS security that blocks threats before they reach users

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Cisco Umbrella is the safer default for enterprises that prioritize DNS‑level blocking, Cisco ecosystem integration, and a cloud firewall, while Zscaler Internet Access offers deeper SSL inspection, DLP, and sandboxing at the cost of higher complexity and reliance on internet connectivity.

Key differences

  • •Umbrella blocks threats at the DNS layer before connections are made; Zscaler inspects full web/SaaS traffic with SSL/TLS decryption.
  • •Umbrella includes a cloud firewall for outbound/inbound policy; Zscaler adds DLP and sandboxing for zero‑day protection.
  • •Umbrella integrates with Cisco SecureX, Azure AD, Splunk; Zscaler focuses on Microsoft 365, Salesforce, broader CASB integrations.
  • •Umbrella’s UI is noted as complex for beginners; Zscaler also has complex policy configuration but requires specialist expertise.
  • •Zscaler’s enforcement depends on internet connectivity, whereas Umbrella’s DNS layer works even with limited connectivity.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are paid subscription models; no pricing details provided to differentiate.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Both products are described as having complex policy interfaces for beginners.

Tie

Features & depth

Zscaler adds full SSL/TLS decryption, DLP, and sandboxing beyond Umbrella's DNS and firewall capabilities.

Zscaler Internet Access

Integrations & ecosystem

Umbrella lists more integrations (SecureX, Azure AD, Splunk) compared with Zscaler's four listed.

Cisco Umbrella

Scalability

Both are cloud/SaaS, designed to scale instantly for global user bases.

Tie

Support

Both offer 24/7 support via email, live chat, and phone.

Tie

Security & privacy

Both provide up‑to‑date threat intelligence; Umbrella focuses on DNS/blocking, Zscaler on deep inspection.

Tie

Choose Cisco Umbrella if…

Large enterprises needing DNS‑level protection, Cisco ecosystem integration, and a cloud firewall.

Choose Zscaler Internet Access if…

Organizations prioritizing deep SSL inspection, DLP, sandboxing, and zero‑trust SaaS protection.

Common questions

Which solution blocks threats earlier in the network stack?

Cisco Umbrella blocks at the DNS layer, preventing connections before they are made.

Do either of these products require on‑prem hardware?

Both are cloud/SaaS solutions and do not require on‑prem hardware.

What integrations are available for each platform?

Umbrella integrates with Cisco SecureX, Azure AD, Okta, Splunk, ServiceNow; Zscaler integrates with Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Okta, ServiceNow.