Call of Duty 3 vs Medal of Honor: Heroes
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Step into the shoes of Allied soldiers as they fight across iconic WWII locations in this intense first‑person shooter. With a gripping single‑player campaign and robust multiplayer modes, Call of Duty 3 delivers fast‑paced action and authentic wartime atmosphere.
Medal of Honor: Heroes delivers intense first‑person shooter action set during World War II, letting players experience iconic battles across Europe. The game blends arcade‑style gunplay with strategic objectives, offering both single‑player missions and multiplayer modes. Developed by EA Canada and published by Electronic Arts, the title features a variety of weapons, destructible environments, and a competitive online component. Though released in 2006, it remains a nostalgic entry for fans of classic military shooters.
- Authentic WWII settings
- Strong multiplayer variety
- Split‑screen co‑op support
- Solid weapon variety
- Fast‑paced, accessible combat.
- Variety of weapons and maps.
- Solid multiplayer experience.
- Nostalgic WWII setting.
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map selection
- Occasional AI pathing issues
- Limited graphics by modern standards.
- Short single‑player campaign length.
- Online community has dwindled.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Call of Duty 3
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
Alternatives to Medal of Honor: Heroes
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataMedal of Honor: Heroes offers a cheaper, fast‑paced online shooter with larger player lobbies, while Call of Duty 3 costs more but adds split‑screen co‑op and richer campaign features.
Key differences
- •Price: $19.99 vs $59.99
- •Maximum online players: 16 vs 12
- •Split‑screen co‑op: none vs two‑player co‑op
- •Campaign length/detail: ten missions vs scripted WWII set‑pieces
- •Critic score: 50/100 vs 74/100
Pricing & value
Medal of Honor costs $19.99, three‑quarters less than Call of Duty's $59.99 price.
Gameplay & fun factor
Call of Duty includes dynamic weather, scripted set‑pieces, and customizable weapons, adding tactical depth.
Multiplayer / co‑op
Call of Duty offers split‑screen co‑op and objective‑based modes; Medal of Honor only online deathmatch.
Content & replayability
Call of Duty's campaign recreates historic battles and has a robust ranking system; Medal of Honor has only ten missions.
Platform availability
Both are listed as paid titles with no specific platform details provided.
Difficulty & accessibility
Both carry an ESRB T rating; no further difficulty information is given.
Graphics & performance
Both games are noted as having dated graphics by modern standards; no comparative data available.
Choose Call of Duty 3 if…
Players who want split‑screen co‑op, a richer campaign, and more tactical features.
Choose Medal of Honor: Heroes if…
Budget‑focused players who prioritize larger online matches and quick skirmishes.
Common questions
Which game is cheaper?
Medal of Honor: Heroes is $19.99; Call of Duty 3 is $59.99.
Can I play with a friend on the same console?
Only Call of Duty 3 supports split‑screen co‑op for two players.
Which title has a larger online multiplayer lobby?
Medal of Honor: Heroes supports up to 16 players, while Call of Duty 3 supports up to 12.