FindAlternative
Back to Battlefield 3: Aftermath

Battlefield 3: Aftermath vs Battlefield 3: Close Quarters

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Battlefield 3: Aftermath
Battlefield 3: AftermathFight for survival amid the ruins of post‑earthquake Tehran.
Battlefield 3: Close Quarters
Battlefield 3: Close QuartersIntense close‑quarters combat for fast‑paced team play
Overview
Description

Set amongst the shattered districts, streets and surrounding villages of a post‑earthquake Tehran, Battlefield 3: Aftertime throws players into a gritty, war‑torn landscape where every corner hides danger. The expansion builds on the core Battlefield 3 experience with new maps, weapons, and a relentless focus on close‑quarters combat in an urban disaster zone.

Battlefield 3: Close Quarters is the second expansion pack for Battlefield 3, delivering tightly designed urban maps that force squads into rapid, infantry‑focused engagements. The pack emphasizes turbulent, quick‑paced battles where teamwork and positioning are paramount.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
First-Person Shooters
First-Person Shooters
Best for
Fans of realistic military shooters
Fans of fast, team‑based shooters
Specifications
General
msrp
$59.99
$19.99−67%
release date
2012-12-11
2012-06-19
Specifications
developer
EA Digital Illusions CE
EA Digital Illusions CE
publisher
Electronic Arts
Electronic Arts
age rating
ESRB M
ESRB M
multiplayer
Multiplayer
Multiplayer
critic score
70/100
75/100+7%
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Immersive post‑disaster Tehran setting
  • Robust vehicle selection adds tactical depth
  • Destructible environments create dynamic combat
  • Strong multiplayer support across three platforms
  • Focused map design encourages teamwork
  • Fast‑paced action keeps gameplay engaging
  • New weapons enhance close‑range tactics
  • Optimized for all three major platforms
Cons
  • Limited to the original Battlefield 3 engine, causing dated graphics
  • Occasional server latency on PC
  • Map size can feel overwhelming for new players
  • Limited variety compared to base game
  • May feel repetitive after extended play
  • Requires purchase of original Battlefield 3
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Battlefield 3: Aftermath

View all →
Battlefield 3: Armored Kill
Battlefield 3: Armored Kill

Unleash massive vehicular warfare with new tanks, ATVs, and the biggest Battlefield map ever.

Compare
Battlefield 3: Close Quarters
Battlefield 3: Close Quarters

Intense close‑quarters combat for fast‑paced team play

Compare
Battlefield 3: End Game
Battlefield 3: End Game

Expand the battlefield with new maps, weapons, and an air superiority mode.

Compare
Battlefield 3: Back to Karkand
Battlefield 3: Back to Karkand

Remastered classic maps with Frostbite 2 destruction for intense multiplayer battles.

Compare

Alternatives to Battlefield 3: Close Quarters

View all →
Battlefield 3: Aftermath
Battlefield 3: Aftermath

Fight for survival amid the ruins of post‑earthquake Tehran.

Compare
Battlefield 3: End Game
Battlefield 3: End Game

Expand the battlefield with new maps, weapons, and an air superiority mode.

Compare
Battlefield 3: Back to Karkand
Battlefield 3: Back to Karkand

Remastered classic maps with Frostbite 2 destruction for intense multiplayer battles.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Battlefield 3: Close Quarters (A) is a cheap, focused add‑on for tight, fast‑paced team fights, while Battlefield 3: Aftermath (B) is a pricier, larger‑scale expansion with a new Tehran map, vehicles and destructible environments.

Key differences

  • •Price: A costs $19.99, B costs $59.99.
  • •Map & content focus: A offers confined urban maps for close‑range combat; B adds a single large Tehran map with vehicles and destructible terrain.
  • •Multiplayer scale: A emphasizes fast, squad‑based firefights; B supports up to 24 players in chaotic, vehicle‑heavy battles.
  • •Critic reception: A has a 75/100 score, B has 70/100.
  • •Replay variety: A may feel repetitive due to limited map variety; B offers more diverse tactics thanks to vehicles and dynamic destruction.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

A is $19.99 versus B at $59.99, giving more bang‑for‑buck if you only want close‑quarters play.

Battlefield 3: Close Quarters

Gameplay & fun factor

B adds vehicles, destructible environments, and a larger map, providing broader tactical options than A's confined fights.

Battlefield 3: Aftermath

Platform availability

Both are optimized for PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, and PC.

Tie

Multiplayer / co‑op

B supports up to 24 players and emphasizes co‑op squad play with voice chat; A focuses on smaller, fast‑paced team matches.

Battlefield 3: Aftermath

Content & replayability

B's new map, vehicles, and destructible terrain give more varied replay experiences than A's limited map set.

Battlefield 3: Aftermath

Difficulty & accessibility

A’s confined maps and focused mechanics are easier for new players to grasp than B’s larger, vehicle‑heavy battles.

Battlefield 3: Close Quarters

Graphics & performance

Both run on the same Battlefield 3 engine; B notes occasional PC latency, but no clear performance edge.

Tie

Choose Battlefield 3: Aftermath if…

Players seeking a larger map, vehicles, destructible environments, and broader multiplayer battles despite higher cost.

Choose Battlefield 3: Close Quarters if…

Players who want cheap, fast, close‑quarters team combat and already own Battlefield 3.

Common questions

Do I need the original Battlefield 3 to play either expansion?

Not specified in the provided facts.

Which expansion offers more multiplayer players?

Aftermath (B) supports up to 24 players; Close Quarters (A) focuses on smaller, fast‑paced matches.

Is the price difference justified by content?

A is $19.99 with limited maps; B is $59.99 but adds a new Tehran map, vehicles, and destructible environments.