Augment Code vs Devin
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Augment Code's Cosmos platform is built to run an organization's software delivery process end to end using connected AI agents rather than a single coding autocomplete tool. Teams assemble 'loops' such as code review, ticket-to-PR delegation, vulnerability remediation, and incident response, each handled by reusable 'Experts' that carry the organization's judgment forward into future runs.
Devin, built by Cognition, is marketed as an autonomous AI software engineer rather than a code-completion assistant. Given a task description, it plans the work, writes and edits code, runs tests, debugs failures, and can deploy the result inside its own sandboxed virtual machine that includes a shell, browser, and code editor. Unlike inline coding assistants that suggest snippets as a developer types, Devin is designed to work through an entire engineering task with minimal supervision, from initial architecture decisions to opening a pull request. Pricing has shifted from an initial enterprise-only offering to self-serve plans, letting individual developers and small teams try it starting at a low monthly cost.
- Goes beyond single-file code completion into full software-lifecycle automation
- Human-in-the-loop approval gates are built into the design rather than an afterthought
- Reusable Expert templates let an organization's judgment compound across future runs
- Flexible deployment options including self-hosted sandboxes for sensitive code
- Handles multi-step engineering tasks end-to-end rather than just suggesting individual lines of code.
- Runs in an isolated sandboxed environment, reducing risk to a developer's local machine.
- Entry-level Pro plan is inexpensive relative to the original enterprise pricing.
- Usage-based enterprise billing accommodates variable workloads.
- No public pricing; requires booking a demo to get a quote
- Aimed at organizational-scale software delivery, likely more than a solo developer needs
- Effectiveness depends on properly configuring triggers, experts, and quality gates for your workflow
- Autonomous agents can still make incorrect assumptions on ambiguous tasks, so output needs review before merging.
- Higher-usage plans (Max, Teams, Enterprise) can get expensive quickly for heavy usage.
- Best suited to well-scoped tasks; open-ended or highly ambiguous requests need more human guidance.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Augment Code
View all →
Alternatives to Devin
View all →Agent orchestration platform that runs code review, PR authoring, and incident response loops.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataAugment Code offers enterprise‑grade, orchestrated automation with human‑in‑the‑loop controls, while Devin provides a lower‑cost, autonomous sandbox for well‑scoped tasks.
Key differences
- •Augment Code includes built‑in human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints; Devin relies on fully autonomous execution.
- •Pricing model: Augment Code requires a demo‑based quote; Devin has a freemium tier and inexpensive Pro plans.
- •Augment Code ships reusable "Expert" templates for repeatable loops; Devin focuses on single‑task autonomous execution.
- •Integrations: Augment Code lists specific native triggers (GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira); Devin mentions only generic pull‑request creation.
- •Deployment flexibility: Augment Code can run in self‑hosted sandboxes; Devin is cloud‑only.
Pricing & value
Devin offers a freemium tier and low‑cost Pro plan; Augment Code has no public pricing and requires a demo.
Ease of use / learning curve
Devin’s autonomous flow is ready‑out‑of‑the‑box; Augment Code needs configuration of triggers, experts, and quality gates.
Features & depth
Augment Code provides multiple lifecycle loops (code review, ticket‑to‑PR, vulnerability remediation, incident response) with human checkpoints.
Integrations & ecosystem
Augment Code lists native integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira; Devin only mentions generic PR creation.
Collaboration
Human‑in‑the‑loop gates and reusable Expert templates support team governance; Devin is primarily a single autonomous agent.
Scalability
Augment Code can run in managed cloud or self‑hosted sandboxes, targeting organization‑scale delivery; Devin is cloud‑only.
Security & privacy
Augment Code offers self‑hosted sandbox deployment for sensitive code; Devin runs only in a cloud sandbox.
Choose Augment Code if…
Large engineering orgs needing orchestrated, review‑gated automation across the software lifecycle.
Choose Devin if…
Teams or individuals wanting low‑cost, autonomous code generation for well‑scoped tasks.
Common questions
What is the cost to start using each product?
Devin has a freemium tier and inexpensive Pro plan; Augment Code requires contacting sales for a quote.
Can I run the tool on my own infrastructure?
Augment Code supports self‑hosted sandboxes; Devin is cloud‑only.
Do the tools support human review before changes are merged?
Augment Code includes built‑in human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints; Devin’s autonomous agents output code that must be manually reviewed.