FindAlternative
Back to Activepieces

Activepieces vs Zapier

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Activepieces
ActivepiecesOpen-source no-code automation platform for building workflows
Visit
Zapier
ZapierConnect your apps and automate workflows without code
Visit
Overview
Description

Activepieces is an open-source, no-code automation tool that lets you connect apps and create custom workflows without writing code. It provides a visual editor and a library of pre-built actions, making it easy to automate repetitive tasks. Positioned as a self‑hosted alternative to Zapier, Activepieces can run on your own infrastructure or be used via the hosted cloud service, giving you full control over data privacy and scalability.

Zapier is a cloud‑based automation platform that lets users connect thousands of web applications to create custom workflows, called Zaps, without writing code. By defining triggers and actions across apps, Zapier moves data, automates repetitive tasks, and streamlines processes for individuals and organizations of any size.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Low-Code / No-Code
Low-Code / No-Code
Best for
Developers and teams needing self‑hosted automation
Businesses and teams automating workflows
Specifications
open source
Yes
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community Forum, GitHub Issues, Email
Email, Live Chat, Help Center
key integrations
Slack, Gmail, GitHub, Notion, Airtable, Zapier
Slack, Google Sheets, Gmail, Trello, Salesforce, HubSpot
deployment
—
Cloud/SaaS
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open-source and self‑hostable
  • No-code visual editor lowers entry barrier
  • Extensible with custom code steps
  • Free tier includes unlimited workflows
  • No-code interface makes automation accessible to non‑technical users.
  • Huge catalog of pre‑built integrations reduces setup time.
  • Flexible conditional logic handles complex scenarios.
  • Scalable from individual freelancers to enterprise teams.
Cons
  • Smaller connector library than major SaaS competitors
  • Self‑hosting requires technical setup
  • Limited native mobile app support
  • Higher‑tier plans can be costly for large volumes of tasks.
  • Limited offline or on‑premises deployment options.
  • Some niche apps may lack direct integration, requiring workarounds.
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Activepieces

View all →
nocobase
nocobase

Open-source, flexible, and extensible low-code platform

Compare
Zapier
Zapier

Connect your apps and automate workflows without code

Compare
Windmill
Windmill

Turn code into workflows, internal tools, and APIs instantly

Compare
Make
Make

Automate any workflow without code

Compare

Alternatives to Zapier

View all →
n8n
n8n

Automate workflows with a fair-code licensed tool

Compare
Pabbly Connect
Pabbly Connect

Workflow automation platform connecting 2,000+ apps with a one-time payment option.

Compare
Make
Make

Automate any workflow without code

Compare
Activepieces
Activepieces

Open-source no-code automation platform for building workflows

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Activepieces offers open‑source, self‑hosted automation with unlimited free workflows but fewer connectors, while Zapier provides a massive integration catalog in a fully managed cloud service at higher cost for heavy usage.

Key differences

  • •Self‑hosting vs. cloud‑only: Activepieces can run on your own servers; Zapier is SaaS only.
  • •Connector breadth: Zapier lists >5,000 integrations; Activepieces has ~200 native connectors.
  • •Extensibility: Activepieces allows custom JavaScript/TypeScript steps; Zapier relies on built‑in actions and webhooks.
  • •Support model: Activepieces offers community‑based support; Zapier provides email, live chat, and a help center.
  • •Pricing impact for high volume: Zapier’s higher‑tier plans can become costly; Activepieces’ free tier includes unlimited workflows.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Activepieces freemium includes unlimited workflows; Zapier’s higher‑tier plans cost more for large task volumes.

Activepieces

Ease of use / learning curve

Zapier’s no‑code UI is aimed at non‑technical users, while Activepieces requires self‑hosting setup.

Zapier

Features & depth

Zapier offers extensive conditional logic, paths, and a huge library of pre‑built actions.

Zapier

Integrations & ecosystem

Zapier lists over 5,000 integrations; Activepieces supports about 200 native connectors.

Zapier

Collaboration

Both provide role‑based access (Activepieces) and team sharing/permissions (Zapier).

Tie

Scalability

Zapier’s cloud infrastructure scales automatically; Activepieces scaling depends on your own hosting capacity.

Zapier

Support

Zapier offers email, live chat, and a help center; Activepieces relies on community forum and GitHub.

Zapier

Security & privacy

Activepieces can be self‑hosted for full data control; Zapier runs in the cloud with no on‑prem option.

Activepieces

Choose Activepieces if…

Teams needing full data control, willing to self‑host, and comfortable with limited connectors.

Choose Zapier if…

Businesses prioritizing a vast integration catalog, low‑code ease, and managed cloud service.

Common questions

Can I run automations on-premises with Zapier?

No. Zapier is a cloud‑only SaaS; on‑premises deployment is not offered.

Does Activepieces have a free tier for unlimited workflows?

Yes. The freemium plan includes unlimited workflows, though you must host it yourself.

Which platform has more ready‑made app connectors?

Zapier, with over 5,000 integrations, versus Activepieces’ roughly 200 native connectors.