FindAlternative
Back to 7‑Zip

7‑Zip vs The Unarchiver

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
7‑Zip
7‑ZipHigh‑performance file archiver with strong compression
The Unarchiver
The UnarchiverFree Mac app that opens RAR, 7z, and dozens of other archive formats the built-in tool cannot.
Overview
Description

7‑Zip is a free, open‑source file compression utility that supports a wide range of archive formats. It offers a high compression ratio for its native 7z format and can handle ZIP, RAR, TAR, GZIP, and many others. The program integrates with Windows Explorer for easy right‑click operations and provides a powerful command‑line interface for scripting and automation. It runs on Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile tool for developers and power users alike.

The Unarchiver is a free macOS application that extracts a wide range of archive formats beyond what Apple's built-in Archive Utility supports, including RAR, 7z, Tar, Gzip, Bzip2, CAB, and many legacy formats like StuffIt, ARJ, and LZH. It can be set as the default handler for these formats so double-clicking any supported archive just works. The app also handles archives with foreign-language filenames, encrypted and multi-volume archives, and can extract files from self-extracting Windows EXE installers. A companion iOS app called Archives brings similar extraction capability to iPhone and iPad.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Archivers & Compression
Archivers & Compression
Best for
Developers and power users
Mac users who need to open archive formats beyond what macOS supports natively
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
No
api available
No
No
support options
Email, Community Forums
Website FAQ
key integrations
—
macOS Finder default-app association
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Completely free with no ads
  • Very high compression ratios
  • Supports many archive formats
  • Open‑source and regularly updated
  • Completely free with no in-app purchases or ads.
  • Supports a far wider range of archive formats than macOS's built-in tool.
  • Lightweight and simple; installs quickly and just works as a default handler.
  • Handles edge cases like foreign filenames and old, obscure formats well.
Cons
  • No native macOS GUI (requires third‑party ports)
  • Limited integration with cloud storage services
  • No built‑in file synchronization features
  • Mac-only for the desktop app, though a separate iOS app exists.
  • No archive creation features; it only extracts, it does not compress.
  • Interface is minimal, with no advanced repair or password-recovery tools.
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to 7‑Zip

View all →
PeaZip
PeaZip

Free, open-source file archiver supporting 200+ formats with strong encryption on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Compare
NanaZip
NanaZip

Modern open-source 7-Zip fork built for Windows 10 and 11

Compare
WinRAR
WinRAR

Fast, reliable archive manager for RAR, ZIP and many other formats

Compare
The Unarchiver
The Unarchiver

Free Mac app that opens RAR, 7z, and dozens of other archive formats the built-in tool cannot.

Compare

Alternatives to The Unarchiver

View all →
PeaZip
PeaZip

Free, open-source file archiver supporting 200+ formats with strong encryption on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Compare
Bandizip
Bandizip

Fast, cross-platform archiver supporting 10+ compression formats and 40+ decompression formats.

Compare
7‑Zip
7‑Zip

High‑performance file archiver with strong compression

Compare
Keka
Keka

A simple, strong macOS file archiver for compressing, encrypting, and extracting archives.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

7‑Zip is the go‑to free, cross‑platform tool for creating and extracting archives with strong compression, while The Unarchiver is the simplest free Mac‑only extractor for a very wide range of formats but cannot create archives.

Key differences

  • •7‑Zip creates and compresses archives; The Unarchiver only extracts.
  • •7‑Zip runs on Windows (and via ports on other OS); The Unarchiver is macOS‑only (desktop).
  • •7‑Zip offers AES‑256 encryption and multithreaded solid compression; The Unarchiver lacks encryption and compression features.
  • •The Unarchiver integrates as the default macOS Finder handler and supports many legacy Mac formats; 7‑Zip integrates via Windows Explorer context menu.
  • •7‑Zip is open‑source and free with community support; The Unarchiver is closed‑source but also free, with only website FAQ support.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free, but 7‑Zip adds compression creation value, giving it higher overall utility.

7‑Zip

Ease of use / learning curve

The Unarchiver installs quickly on macOS and works as a default handler with minimal configuration.

The Unarchiver

Features & depth

7‑Zip provides archive creation, AES‑256 encryption, solid multithreaded compression, and command‑line batch processing.

7‑Zip

Integrations & ecosystem

The Unarchiver integrates directly with macOS Finder as the default app; 7‑Zip only integrates with Windows Explorer.

The Unarchiver

Support

7‑Zip offers email and community‑forum support; The Unarchiver only provides a website FAQ.

7‑Zip

Security & privacy

7‑Zip includes AES‑256 encryption for archives; The Unarchiver can open encrypted files but cannot create them.

7‑Zip

Scalability

7‑Zip’s multithreaded solid compression handles large archives efficiently; The Unarchiver is limited to extraction only.

7‑Zip

Choose 7‑Zip if…

Windows power users or developers needing to create, encrypt, and batch‑process archives across many formats.

Choose The Unarchiver if…

Mac users who only need to open a broad range of archive types without creating them.

Common questions

Can either tool create new archives?

Only 7‑Zip can create archives; The Unarchiver is extraction‑only.

Is there any cost to use these tools?

Both are free; 7‑Zip is open‑source, The Unarchiver is free but closed‑source.

Which tool works on macOS?

The Unarchiver runs natively on macOS; 7‑Zip has no native macOS GUI and requires third‑party ports.