FindAlternative
Back to 3DMark

3DMark vs Geekbench

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
3DMark
3DMarkIndustry-standard PC benchmarking suite for measuring gaming and graphics performance.
Visit
Geekbench
GeekbenchCross-platform benchmark utility that measures processor and memory performance.
Visit
Overview
Description

3DMark, made by UL Solutions, is a cross-platform benchmarking tool used to measure how a PC or device performs with modern games and graphics technologies. It automatically scans a system's hardware and recommends the most appropriate benchmark to run.

Geekbench is a comprehensive cross-platform benchmarking tool designed to measure system performance with a single click. It evaluates both single-core and multi-core capabilities across various workloads to provide a clear picture of how a device handles everyday tasks and demanding applications. Widely used by consumers, hardware reviewers, and IT professionals, Geekbench provides standardized scoring metrics to easily compare performance across different operating systems and hardware architectures. Its detailed reporting helps users diagnose performance bottlenecks and evaluate hardware upgrades.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Freemium
Category
Benchmarking
Benchmarking
Best for
PC gamers, hardware reviewers, overclockers, and system builders
Hardware enthusiasts, reviewers, and IT professionals
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
No
No
api available
No
Yes
support options
—
Email Support, Knowledge Base
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Widely recognized, industry-standard benchmark used by reviewers and enthusiasts
  • Covers a broad range of tests from ray tracing to storage and stress testing
  • Cross-platform support extends beyond just Windows PCs
  • Score comparison database makes it easy to see how a build stacks up
  • Easy to use with a single-click testing process
  • Comprehensive cross-platform support
  • Detailed and shareable online result browser
  • Includes specialized AI and GPU workloads
Cons
  • Base purchase and Advanced Edition are separate one-time costs, which can add up
  • Enterprise/site licensing pricing is not published and requires contacting sales
  • Aimed primarily at gaming/graphics performance, less useful for general productivity benchmarking
  • Free version is limited to 32-bit testing on some platforms
  • Does not provide granular component stress testing
  • Advanced features require a paid professional license
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to 3DMark

View all →
Geekbench
Geekbench

Cross-platform benchmark utility that measures processor and memory performance.

Compare
Novabench
Novabench

Cross-platform PC benchmark and stress-test tool for CPU, GPU, memory, storage and network performance.

Compare
Sandra
Sandra

Comprehensive system analyzer and benchmarking tool for Windows PCs.

Compare
AIDA64
AIDA64

Industry-leading system information, diagnostics, and benchmarking software.

Compare

Alternatives to Geekbench

View all →
Sandra
Sandra

Comprehensive system analyzer and benchmarking tool for Windows PCs.

Compare
AIDA64
AIDA64

Industry-leading system information, diagnostics, and benchmarking software.

Compare
Prime95
Prime95

A heavy-duty CPU stress testing and Mersenne prime discovery tool.

Compare
CPU-Z
CPU-Z

A freeware system profiling and monitoring application for Windows and Android.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

3DMark is the go‑to tool for detailed gaming/graphics benchmarking with a one‑time purchase, while Geekbench offers broader CPU/GPU/AI tests for free with optional paid upgrades.

Key differences

  • •3DMark focuses on gaming graphics and includes ray‑tracing and storage stress tests; Geekbench targets general CPU, memory, and AI performance.
  • •Pricing model: 3DMark is a one‑time paid product (with optional Advanced Edition); Geekbench is freemium with a paid professional tier.
  • •API availability: Geekbench provides an API for automation; 3DMark does not.
  • •Cross‑platform depth: Both are cross‑platform, but 3DMark also runs on Android/iOS and macOS Apple Silicon, while Geekbench’s mobile support is less detailed.
  • •Result sharing: Geekbench includes an online browser for easy result comparison; 3DMark’s score comparison is limited to its own database.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Geekbench offers a free tier; 3DMark requires a one‑time purchase for any use.

Geekbench

Ease of use / learning curve

Geekbench provides single‑click testing; 3DMark requires selecting specific benchmark suites.

Geekbench

Features & depth

3DMark includes extensive graphics, ray‑tracing, storage, and stress tests not found in Geekbench.

3DMark

Integrations & ecosystem

Geekbench offers an API and command‑line tools; 3DMark has no API.

Geekbench

Support

Geekbench lists email support and a knowledge base; 3DMark support details not specified.

Geekbench

Scalability

3DMark provides enterprise/site licensing (though pricing not published) for large deployments.

3DMark

Security & privacy

Both are closed‑source desktop apps; no specific security details provided.

Tie

Choose 3DMark if…

Gamers, reviewers, or hardware builders needing deep graphics and stress benchmarks.

Choose Geekbench if…

Enthusiasts or IT pros wanting quick CPU/GPU/AI scores with free access and automation.

Common questions

Can I try either tool for free?

Geekbench has a freemium tier; 3DMark requires purchase before any use.

Which tool can automate testing across many machines?

Geekbench provides an API and command‑line automation; 3DMark does not.

Do both tools support macOS Apple Silicon?

3DMark explicitly supports macOS Apple Silicon; Geekbench’s macOS support is mentioned but not specified for Apple Silicon.