FindAlternative
Back to Ultimaker 3

Ultimaker 3 vs MakerGear M3

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Ultimaker 3
Ultimaker 3A reliable dual-extrusion desktop 3D printer for professional prototyping and complex geometries.
MakerGear M3
MakerGear M3Industrial-grade desktop 3D printer built for precision and reliability.
Overview
Description

The Ultimaker 3 is a robust, dual-extrusion desktop 3D printer engineered to deliver high uptime and seamless workflow integration for professionals and educators. It features an intelligent print core system, active filament flow monitoring, and optimized print profiles that consistently produce accurate mechanical parts and intricate visual prototypes. Equipped with automatic bed leveling and NFC-enabled material recognition, the printer streamlines setup and minimizes user intervention. Its open filament system supports a wide array of advanced thermoplastics, while water-soluble PVA support material enables the creation of complex internal geometries with clean, easy post-processing.

The MakerGear M3 is a robust, American-made desktop 3D printer engineered for continuous professional use. Featuring a rigid chassis and high-temperature hot end, it delivers exceptional dimensional accuracy across a wide variety of engineering-grade filaments. Designed with seamless network connectivity and user-friendly operation, the M3 integrates smoothly into engineering labs, workshops, and production environments. It empowers professionals and educators to rapidly prototype and manufacture end-use parts with minimal downtime.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
FDM 3D Printers
FDM 3D Printers
Best for
Professionals, engineers, and educators
Engineers, educators, and small manufacturers
Specifications
General
msrp
$3499
$33006%
Specifications
weight
10.6 kg
14 kg+32%
warranty
1 year
1 Year Limited Warranty
dimensions
342 x 505 x 588 mm+584%
50 x 48 x 52 cm
open source
No
No
connectivity
Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB port
Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
power source
AC Powered
AC Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Reliable dual extrusion system with easy-to-swap print cores
  • Seamless integration with Cura slicing software and material profiles
  • Automatic bed leveling reduces initial setup and calibration errors
  • Water-soluble support enables complex internal geometries without manual cleanup
  • Exceptional build quality and industrial reliability
  • Compatible with a vast array of open-source filaments
  • Dependable wireless network connectivity
  • Strong technical support and USA manufacturing
Cons
  • Higher price point compared to entry-level hobbyist 3D printers
  • Proprietary print cores are more expensive than traditional third-party nozzles
  • Enclosure is semi-open, which limits printing with advanced warp-prone industrial filaments like ABS or PC without modifications
  • Higher initial price point compared to hobbyist printers
  • Enclosure may require aftermarket additions for ultra-sensitive filaments
  • Heavier and larger footprint than entry-level machines
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Ultimaker 3

View all →
📦
Raise3D Pro2

Professional dual-extruder 3D printer engineered for reliable industrial manufacturing.

Compare
Prusa MK4
Prusa MK4

A reliable, open-source FDM 3D printer trusted by makers worldwide.

Compare
LulzBot Mini 2
LulzBot Mini 2

A compact, reliable, and high-performance desktop 3D printer built in the USA.

Compare
Dremel DigiLab 3D45
Dremel DigiLab 3D45

A reliable and advanced 3D printer designed for educators, makers, and professionals.

Compare

Alternatives to MakerGear M3

View all →
📦
Raise3D Pro2

Professional dual-extruder 3D printer engineered for reliable industrial manufacturing.

Compare
Ultimaker 3
Ultimaker 3

A reliable dual-extrusion desktop 3D printer for professional prototyping and complex geometries.

Compare
Dremel DigiLab 3D45
Dremel DigiLab 3D45

A reliable and advanced 3D printer designed for educators, makers, and professionals.

Compare
LulzBot Mini 2
LulzBot Mini 2

A compact, reliable, and high-performance desktop 3D printer built in the USA.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both printers target professional users, but the Ultimaker 3 offers dual extrusion and seamless Cura integration, while the MakerGear M3 provides higher temperature capability and a sturdier steel frame.

Key differences

  • Dual extrusion with water‑soluble support (Ultimaker 3) vs. single extruder but 300 °C hot‑end (MakerGear M3).
  • Interchangeable proprietary print cores (Ultimaker 3) vs. open‑source filament system accepting any 1.75 mm material (MakerGear M3).
  • Integrated camera and NFC material recognition (Ultimaker 3) vs. custom firmware with independent operation (MakerGear M3).
  • Weight and footprint: Ultimaker 3 is lighter (10.6 kg) and slightly smaller than MakerGear M3 (14 kg, larger dimensions).
  • Warranty and support: both offer 1‑year coverage, but MakerGear emphasizes USA manufacturing and strong technical support.
DimensionWinner

Performance

MakerGear M3 reaches 300 °C hot‑end and 50 µm layer height, enabling advanced engineering filaments and finer detail.

MakerGear M3

Build quality

MakerGear M3 uses a powder‑coated steel frame that minimizes vibration, offering higher industrial reliability.

MakerGear M3

Connectivity

Both provide Wi‑Fi, Ethernet, and USB connections for remote management.

Tie

Power & efficiency

Both are AC powered with no specified differences in power consumption.

Tie

Compatibility

MakerGear M3’s open‑source filament system accepts virtually any 1.75 mm material, unlike Ultimaker’s proprietary cores.

MakerGear M3

Price & value

MakerGear M3 is $3300 vs. Ultimaker 3 at $3499, offering slightly lower upfront cost.

MakerGear M3

Warranty & support

Both include a 1‑year warranty; MakerGear highlights strong US support, Ultimaker does not specify.

Tie

Choose Ultimaker 3 if…

Professionals needing dual extrusion for complex geometries and integrated Cura workflow.

Choose MakerGear M3 if…

Engineers requiring high‑temp materials, finer resolution, and a robust steel chassis.

Common questions

Can I print with ABS or PC on either printer?

Ultimaker 3’s semi‑open enclosure limits warp‑prone filaments like ABS/PC without modifications; MakerGear M3 also needs an aftermarket enclosure for such filaments.

Which printer offers better material flexibility?

MakerGear M3 uses an open‑source filament system accepting any 1.75 mm filament, while Ultimaker 3 relies on proprietary print cores.

Is there a built‑in way to monitor prints remotely?

Ultimaker 3 includes an integrated camera for remote observation; MakerGear M3 provides remote job management but no built‑in camera.