FindAlternative
Back to Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat vs Microsoft Teams

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Rocket.Chat
Rocket.ChatSecure CommsOS for mission-critical operations
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft TeamsChat, meetings, and file collaboration built into Microsoft 365.
Overview
Description

Rocket.Chat is an open-source communication platform designed for mission-critical operations. It provides a secure and scalable solution for team collaboration, featuring real-time messaging, video conferencing, and file sharing.

Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform bundled with Microsoft 365, combining chat, video meetings, and file sharing built directly on top of SharePoint and OneDrive. It is the default hub for meetings and internal messaging at organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365. Teams organizes work into teams and channels similar to other chat platforms, but is distinguished by tight integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Planner, allowing documents to be co-authored directly inside a channel without leaving the app. Meetings support up to thousands of attendees with features like live captions, together mode, and background noise suppression, making Teams a common choice for both daily standups and large all-hands meetings.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium

Free tier available; included with Microsoft 365 Business plans from $6/user/month.

Category
Team Chat
Team Chat
Best for
Enterprise teams and organizations
Enterprises using Microsoft 365
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
45,921
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Support
Help Center, Enterprise Support
key integrations
Slack, Notion, GitHub, Jira, and more
Outlook, SharePoint, Excel, Planner
primary language
TypeScript
platforms
Web, Mac, Windows, iOS, Android
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Scalable architecture for large teams and organizations
  • End-to-end encryption for secure communication
  • Wide range of integrations with external services
  • Deep Office 365 integration
  • Scales to very large meetings
  • Strong enterprise admin controls
  • Included with many M365 plans
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for administrators
  • Limited support for certain features in the free version
  • Requires technical expertise for customization and integration
  • Interface can feel cluttered
  • Can be resource-heavy on older machines
  • Channel organization less intuitive than competitors
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
7
User rating
Not enough data
4.5 (4)

What reviewers say

Rocket.Chat Reviews

No reviews yet.

Microsoft Teams Reviews

4.5 (4)
Verified User

Highly recommend Microsoft Teams

We've been using Microsoft Teams for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference for our team. Strong enterprise admin controls. One minor gripe: can be resource-heavy on older machines, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Verified User

Great tool for communication

Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Scales to very large meetings. One minor gripe: interface can feel cluttered, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Verified User

Highly recommend Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Strong enterprise admin controls. No major complaints so far. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Rocket.Chat

View all →

No alternatives listed yet. Browse similar tools →

Alternatives to Microsoft Teams

View all →
Slack
Slack

Where work happens

Compare
Google Meet
Google Meet

Video meetings built into Google Workspace.

Compare
Zoom
Zoom

Reliable video conferencing for meetings, webinars, and rooms.

Compare
Discord
Discord

Voice, video, and text chat for communities.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Microsoft Teams is the safer default for organizations already on Microsoft 365, while Rocket.Chat offers deeper security and customization at the cost of admin complexity.

Key differences

  • Deployment model: Teams is cloud SaaS, Rocket.Chat is self‑hosted.
  • Security: Rocket.Chat provides end‑to‑end encryption; Teams does not list it.
  • Integration focus: Teams ties tightly to Office apps; Rocket.Chat integrates broadly via webhooks and external services.
  • Admin overhead: Teams has built‑in enterprise controls; Rocket.Chat requires technical expertise to configure.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both freemium, but Teams is included with many M365 plans starting $6/user, reducing incremental cost.

Microsoft Teams

Ease of use / learning curve

Teams offers familiar Office UI; Rocket.Chat has a steep admin learning curve.

Microsoft Teams

Features & depth

Teams supports up to 10,000 attendees, live captions, and deep Office co‑authoring.

Microsoft Teams

Integrations & ecosystem

Both have strong integrations: Teams with Outlook/SharePoint; Rocket.Chat with Slack, GitHub, Jira, etc.

Tie

Collaboration

Teams provides channel‑based chat linked to SharePoint storage and robust meeting tools.

Microsoft Teams

Scalability

Teams handles webinars of 10,000+; Rocket.Chat scales but requires self‑hosting resources.

Microsoft Teams

Support

Rocket.Chat offers 24/7 live chat and email; Teams support limited to Help Center unless enterprise plan.

Rocket.Chat

Security & privacy

Rocket.Chat offers end‑to‑end encryption and multiple auth methods; Teams does not specify E2EE.

Rocket.Chat

Migration / lock‑in

Rocket.Chat is open source and self‑hosted, allowing data export; Teams ties data to Microsoft cloud.

Rocket.Chat

Choose Rocket.Chat if…

Security‑focused teams willing to manage self‑hosting and custom integrations.

Choose Microsoft Teams if…

Enterprises already using Microsoft 365 needing seamless Office integration and large‑scale meetings.

Common questions

Can I use the free tier of each product for a small team?

Yes, both Teams and Rocket.Chat offer freemium tiers.

Which solution provides end‑to‑end encryption?

Rocket.Chat includes end‑to‑end encryption; Teams does not list this feature.

Do I need to host the software myself?

Teams is cloud SaaS; Rocket.Chat requires self‑hosting.