FindAlternative
Back to Radxa Rock 3A

Radxa Rock 3A vs Pine64 PinePhone

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Radxa Rock 3A
Radxa Rock 3AA high-performance single-board computer powered by the Rockchip RK3568 processor.
Pine64 PinePhone
Pine64 PinePhoneAn affordable, community-driven Linux smartphone built to champion user privacy and software freedom.
Overview
Description

The Radxa Rock 3A is a versatile single-board computer designed for developers, IoT enthusiasts, and makers seeking robust computing power in a compact form factor. Equipped with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor and up to 8GB of LPDDR4 RAM, it delivers reliable performance for edge computing, media streaming, and home automation projects. Featuring comprehensive connectivity options including M.2 NVMe SSD support, Gigabit Ethernet, and multiple USB ports, the board bridges the gap between desktop-class utility and embedded hardware flexibility. It supports various Linux distributions and Android, making it an adaptable platform for prototyping and custom industrial deployments.

The Pine64 PinePhone is a unique mobile device designed specifically for Linux enthusiasts, developers, and privacy advocates who want complete control over their mobile hardware and software. Unlike mainstream smartphones, it runs various native mainline Linux distributions rather than Android or iOS, empowering users with open-source transparency. Equipped with practical hardware privacy switches, replaceable components, and standard ARM-based architecture, the PinePhone serves as both a functional daily driver for the technically adventurous and a versatile development platform for alternative mobile operating systems.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
ARM Single-Board Computers
ARM Single-Board Computers
Best for
Developers, IoT engineers, and hardware hobbyists
Linux enthusiasts, developers, and privacy advocates
Specifications
General
msrp
$35 - $75 depending on RAM configuration77%
$150
Specifications
weight
45g
185g+311%
warranty
1 year
30-day warranty+2900%
dimensions
85 x 56 mm
160.5 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm+89%
open source
No
Yes
connectivity
Gigabit Ethernet, optional Wi-Fi/Bluetooth via M.2 E Key
Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0, 4G LTE, GPS
power source
USB Powered
Battery
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-speed NVMe SSD support via M.2 slot
  • Reliable quad-core ARM performance
  • Dual display capabilities up to 4K
  • Extensive operating system support
  • Complete user ownership and open-source software freedom
  • Physical hardware kill switches for enhanced privacy
  • User-replaceable battery and easily repairable modular design
  • Active and supportive global developer community
Cons
  • Requires separate purchase of power supply and storage
  • Limited community documentation compared to older Raspberry Pi models
  • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth require an optional module
  • Performance and battery life lag significantly behind mainstream commercial smartphones
  • Software ecosystem is still evolving and may lack polish for non-technical users
  • Camera quality and cellular modem reliability can be inconsistent depending on the installed distribution
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The PinePhone offers a privacy‑focused, fully open Linux phone with hardware kill switches, while the Radxa Rock 3A is a cheap, high‑performance SBC for developers; choose the phone for mobile privacy, the board for flexible computing.

Key differences

  • Physical privacy kill switches vs no built‑in privacy hardware
  • Smartphone form factor with battery vs board requiring external power and storage
  • All‑winner A64 CPU with modest performance vs Rockchip RK3568 quad‑core Cortex‑A55 up to 2.0 GHz
  • Integrated 4G LTE, Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth on PinePhone vs optional Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth module for Rock 3A
  • Open‑source hardware/software on PinePhone vs closed‑source hardware on Rock 3A
DimensionWinner

Performance

Rock 3A uses a 2.0 GHz Cortex‑A55 quad‑core, outperforming the PinePhone's Allwinner A64 quad‑core.

Radxa Rock 3A

Build quality

PinePhone features a replaceable battery, modular kill switches, and a sturdy phone chassis; Rock 3A is a lightweight PCB.

Pine64 PinePhone

Connectivity

PinePhone includes integrated 4G LTE, Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, GPS; Rock 3A needs optional modules for Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth.

Pine64 PinePhone

Power & efficiency

PinePhone runs on an internal battery for mobile use; Rock 3A requires external USB power and lacks a battery.

Pine64 PinePhone

Compatibility

Rock 3A supports multiple OSes (Debian, Ubuntu, Android) and NVMe storage; PinePhone limited to Linux mobile builds.

Radxa Rock 3A

Price & value

Base Rock 3A starts at $35, while PinePhone costs $150; overall cost lower for the SBC.

Radxa Rock 3A

Warranty & support

Rock 3A offers a 1‑year warranty versus PinePhone's 30‑day warranty.

Radxa Rock 3A

Choose Radxa Rock 3A if…

Developers or IoT hobbyists needing a cheap, high‑performance board with expandability.

Choose Pine64 PinePhone if…

Linux‑savvy mobile users needing privacy and a phone form factor.

Common questions

Which device is cheaper out of the box?

The Radxa Rock 3A starts at $35, while the PinePhone costs $150.

Do either of them include Wi‑Fi and Bluetooth?

PinePhone includes Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, and 4G LTE; Rock 3A requires an optional Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth module.

Can I replace the battery myself?

Yes, the PinePhone has a user‑replaceable standard lithium‑ion battery; the Rock 3A has no battery.