MacPass vs gopass
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
MacPass is a free, open-source password manager designed specifically for macOS. It allows users to securely store and manage their passwords, credit card information, and other sensitive data. MacPass also features automatic password generation, password analysis, and password sharing.
gopass is a password manager designed for teams and individuals who need to securely store and share sensitive information. It provides a secure and scalable solution for managing passwords, API keys, and other secrets.
- Free and open-source
- Secure and reliable
- Easy to use and intuitive
- Specifically designed for macOS
- Secure and scalable solution for password and secrets management
- Easy to use and integrate with other tools and services
- Supports multiple storage backends and platforms
- Open-source and community-driven
- Limited features compared to commercial password managers
- No mobile app available
- Limited customer support
- Limited user interface options
- Steep learning curve for advanced features
- Limited support for certain storage backends
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to MacPass
View all →
Alternatives to gopass
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth MacPass and gopass are free, open‑source password managers, but MacPass is a macOS‑only desktop app focused on individual use, while gopass is a cross‑platform, CLI‑driven solution built for teams and automation.
Key differences
- •Platform support: MacPass runs only on macOS; gopass runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows.
- •User interface: MacPass provides a graphical desktop UI; gopass is primarily CLI with limited UI options.
- •Collaboration: MacPass offers simple password sharing; gopass includes team‑wide secret sharing, permission management, and Git‑based backends.
- •API & automation: MacPass has no API; gopass provides an API for programmatic access and integration.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
MacPass offers a graphical macOS UI, making it easier for non‑technical users than gopass's CLI.
Features & depth
gopass includes team permissions, multiple storage backends, and an API, providing deeper functionality.
Integrations & ecosystem
gopass lists integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and supports cloud backends; MacPass has none.
Collaboration
gopass is designed for team secret sharing and admin control; MacPass only offers basic password sharing.
Scalability
gopass supports multiple storage backends and team administration, scaling beyond single‑user scenarios.
Support
Both rely on email and GitHub Issues for community support; no dedicated support channels.
Security & privacy
Both use end‑to‑end encryption and are open‑source, allowing code review.
Migration / lock‑in
gopass can store data in various backends (including Git), easing migration; MacPass uses a single desktop store.
Choose MacPass if…
Individual macOS users needing a simple graphical password manager.
Choose gopass if…
Developers, DevOps, or teams requiring cross‑platform, scriptable, and collaborative secret management.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either product?
Both MacPass and gopass are free and open‑source.
Can I use the tool on Windows or Linux?
MacPass is macOS‑only; gopass runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows.
Do they support team sharing and admin controls?
MacPass offers basic password sharing; gopass provides robust team sharing, permissions, and integration with Git platforms.