Intel Core Ultra 7 356H vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for demanding applications. With 16 cores, it offers exceptional processing power and efficiency.
The AMD Ryzen 7 8840U is a high-performance processor designed for laptops. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock speed of 3.3 GHz and a boost clock speed of up to 5.1 GHz.
[]
- High-performance processing power
- Efficient power management
- Secure architecture
- Portable design
- High-performance processing with 8 cores and 16 threads
- Integrated graphics with AMD Radeon 780M
- Low power consumption with a TDP of 28W
- Supports PCIe 4.0 for faster storage and peripherals connectivity
- High power consumption
- Expensive
- Limited availability
- May not be suitable for extreme overclocking due to its low TDP
- Limited availability in certain regions
- May require specific cooling solutions due to its high-performance capabilities
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
View all →A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.
A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.
Alternatives to AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataThe Intel Core Ultra 7 356H offers substantially more cores and higher NPU performance, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U provides a reliable 8-core mobile alternative with Radeon graphics. The main trade-off is Intel's higher core/thread count and 45 TOPS NPU versus AMD's 16 TOPS NPU and 28W TDP profile.
Key differences
- •Intel features 16 cores and 32 threads, compared to AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads.
- •Intel includes Intel Arc 140T integrated graphics, whereas AMD features AMD Radeon 780M.
- •Intel's NPU delivers 45 TOPS, while AMD's NPU reaches up to 16 TOPS.
- •Intel is built on a TSMC N3B 3nm process node, while AMD uses a TSMC 4nm FinFET process node.
- •Intel lists a Cinebench R23 Multi score of 18,500, whereas AMD's benchmark score is not specified.
Performance
Intel provides 16 cores, 32 threads, and a Cinebench R23 Multi score of 18,500, outnumbering AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads.
Build quality
Build quality is not specified for either processor since they are raw hardware components.
Connectivity
AMD explicitly supports PCIe 4.0 for faster storage and peripherals connectivity; Intel connectivity features are not specified.
Power & efficiency
AMD features a fixed 28W TDP (15-30W), while Intel lists 15-25W with max boosts up to 80W and a 28W rating up to 64W.
Compatibility
Both use distinct socket types (Intel: BGA2833/LGA1851; AMD: FP7, FP7r2, FP8) tailored for specific mobile and desktop platforms.
Price & value
Pricing is unknown for Intel, and listed as Paid (One-time) without specific currency values for AMD.
Warranty & support
Warranty and support details are not specified for either product in the provided facts.
Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 356H if…
Gamers and developers requiring maximum core counts and high 45 TOPS NPU performance.
Choose AMD Ryzen 7 8840U if…
Users looking for an 8-core processor with AMD Radeon 780M graphics and PCIe 4.0 support.
Common questions
Which processor has better AI performance?
The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H delivers 45 TOPS (NPU), while the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U offers up to 16 TOPS.
How do their graphics capabilities compare?
Intel features integrated Intel Arc 140T graphics, whereas AMD features integrated AMD Radeon 780M graphics.
What are the core and thread counts for each?
The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads.