FindAlternative
Back to Glances

Glances vs LogRocket

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Glances
GlancesCross‑platform real‑time system monitoring for admins and DevOps
Visit
LogRocket
LogRocketSession replay and product analytics for web apps
Visit
Overview
Description

Glances is an open‑source, cross‑platform monitoring tool that provides a concise, real‑time view of system resources such as CPU, memory, disk I/O, network, and processes. It runs on Linux, Windows, macOS and can be accessed via a web interface, making it ideal for both local and remote monitoring. Designed for system administrators and DevOps teams, Glances aggregates metrics into a single dashboard, supports customizable alerts, and integrates with scripts or APIs for automated workflows. Its lightweight design ensures minimal overhead while delivering comprehensive performance insights.

LogRocket captures a video‑like replay of every user interaction on your web application, recording DOM changes, clicks, scrolls, network requests, and console errors. This lets developers see exactly what a user experienced, making debugging fast and precise. Beyond replays, LogRocket provides performance metrics, heatmaps, and state snapshots, and integrates with tools like Slack, Jira, and GitHub to streamline issue triage and product improvements.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Monitoring & Logging
Monitoring & Logging
Best for
System Administrators and DevOps teams
Product teams and frontend developers
Specifications
open source
Yes
No
github stars
33,155
—
api available
No
Yes
support options
Email, GitHub Issues
Email, Live Chat, Documentation
key integrations
InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Cassandra, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Docker
Slack, Jira, GitHub, Segment, Intercom, Linear
primary language
Python
—
deployment
—
Cloud/SaaS
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open‑source and free
  • Runs on all major operating systems
  • Lightweight with low resource overhead
  • Extensible via plugins and API
  • Accurate session replays that include DOM and network data.
  • Automatic error and performance logging without manual instrumentation.
  • Rich integrations with popular dev and project‑management tools.
  • Free tier available for small projects and early testing.
Cons
  • No native mobile app
  • Limited built‑in visualization compared to commercial tools
  • Alerting requires manual configuration or external scripts
  • Only supports web applications; no native mobile SDK.
  • Advanced analytics require paid subscription.
  • Data retention limited on free plan, may need upgrade for long‑term storage.
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Glances

View all →
Grafana
Grafana

Composable observability platform

Compare
netdata
netdata

Real-time system monitoring and performance troubleshooting

Compare
Gatus
Gatus

Self-hosted open-source monitoring and alerting for DevOps teams

Compare
mectrics
mectrics

A free, open-source menu bar app that shows your Mac's CPU, memory, battery, and more.

Compare

Alternatives to LogRocket

View all →
FullStory
FullStory

Session replay and analytics to instantly see how users behave.

Compare
rrweb
rrweb

Record and replay the web

Compare
Highlight.io
Highlight.io

Full‑stack monitoring with session replay, error tracking, logs and performance in one platform.

Compare
Hotjar
Hotjar

Understand visitors with heatmaps, recordings, and instant feedback.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Glances is a free, open‑source system‑monitoring tool for servers and DevOps, while LogRocket is a paid SaaS focused on web‑app user session replay and product analytics.

Key differences

  • •Glances monitors OS‑level resources (CPU, memory, disk, network) whereas LogRocket records user‑level web sessions and UI interactions.
  • •Glances runs on Windows, macOS, Linux and is installed locally; LogRocket is a cloud SaaS with no on‑premise option.
  • •Glances is free and open‑source; LogRocket requires a subscription after a limited free tier.
  • •Alerting in Glances relies on manual config or external scripts; LogRocket provides built‑in Slack/Jira alerts for errors.
  • •LogRocket targets product and frontend teams; Glances targets system administrators and DevOps engineers.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Glances is free and open‑source; LogRocket is a paid subscription with limited free tier.

Glances

Ease of use / learning curve

LogRocket offers a hosted UI and out‑of‑box session replay; Glances requires CLI knowledge and manual alert setup.

LogRocket

Features & depth

LogRocket provides detailed session replay, error tracking, heatmaps, and automatic performance metrics; Glances offers basic system metrics only.

LogRocket

Integrations & ecosystem

Glances integrates with InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Docker, etc.; LogRocket integrates mainly with Slack, Jira, GitHub, Segment.

Glances

Collaboration

LogRocket includes shared replay links and alerts to team tools; Glances lacks built‑in collaboration features.

LogRocket

Scalability

Glances can be deployed on any number of servers locally; LogRocket’s SaaS scales with usage but depends on vendor limits.

Glances

Support

LogRocket offers email, live chat, and documentation; Glances support is limited to email and GitHub issues.

LogRocket

Choose Glances if…

System admins needing free, cross‑platform server resource monitoring with custom plugins.

Choose LogRocket if…

Product teams needing web‑app user session replay, error tracking, and integrated alerts for frontend debugging.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use Glances?

Glances is free and open‑source; no licensing fees are required.

Can LogRocket monitor server‑level metrics like CPU usage?

No, LogRocket focuses on web‑app session replay and frontend performance, not OS‑level resource monitoring.

What support channels are available for each tool?

Glances offers email and GitHub Issues; LogRocket provides email, live chat, and documentation.