FUXA is an open‑source, web‑based platform that lets engineers and operators create interactive visualizations of industrial processes. It supports real‑time data acquisition, alarm handling, and custom widget design without requiring proprietary hardware. The system runs in any modern browser, can be self‑hosted on‑premise, and integrates with common PLCs, MQTT brokers, and OPC-UA servers, making it suitable for factories, utilities, and IoT deployments.
Glances is an open‑source, cross‑platform monitoring tool that provides a concise, real‑time view of system resources such as CPU, memory, disk I/O, network, and processes. It runs on Linux, Windows, macOS and can be accessed via a web interface, making it ideal for both local and remote monitoring. Designed for system administrators and DevOps teams, Glances aggregates metrics into a single dashboard, supports customizable alerts, and integrates with scripts or APIs for automated workflows. Its lightweight design ensures minimal overhead while delivering comprehensive performance insights.
- Fully open‑source and free to use
- Runs in any modern web browser
- Extensible with custom widgets and scripts
- Supports multiple industrial protocols
- Fully open‑source and free
- Runs on all major operating systems
- Lightweight with low resource overhead
- Extensible via plugins and API
- Self‑hosting requires technical setup
- Limited out‑of‑the‑box mobile app support
- Community support may be slower than commercial vendors
- No native mobile app
- Limited built‑in visualization compared to commercial tools
- Alerting requires manual configuration or external scripts
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to FUXA
View all →
Alternatives to Glances
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataGlances is the safer default for general system monitoring with broad OS support and low overhead, while FUXA excels for industrial HMI/SCADA visualizations but requires more setup.
Key differences
- •Glances runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux; FUXA is browser‑only and self‑hosted.
- •Glances focuses on OS metrics (CPU, memory, etc.); FUXA connects to PLCs, OPC‑UA, MQTT for process data.
- •Glances offers many data‑store integrations (InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, etc.); FUXA integrates mainly with industrial protocols.
- •FUXA includes built‑in user authentication and role‑based access; Glances lacks native auth features.
- •Glances is installable via package managers; FUXA requires manual self‑hosting.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Glances installs via apt/yum and runs immediately; FUXA needs self‑hosting and configuration.
Features & depth
FUXA provides drag‑and‑drop HMI design, alarm visual/audible alerts, and protocol connectivity, beyond basic system metrics.
Integrations & ecosystem
Glances lists integrations with InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Cassandra, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Docker, etc.
Collaboration
Both rely on community support via GitHub; no distinct collaboration tools are mentioned.
Scalability
Glances is lightweight, runs on any OS, and can export to time‑series stores for large‑scale monitoring.
Security & privacy
FUXA includes user authentication and role‑based access control; Glances has no native auth.
Choose FUXA if…
Industrial engineers requiring web‑based SCADA/HMI dashboards with PLC, OPC‑UA, MQTT connectivity.
Choose Glances if…
System admins needing lightweight, cross‑platform server/desktop monitoring with many data‑store plugins.
Common questions
Can I monitor Docker containers with these tools?
Glances supports Docker via a plugin; FUXA does not list Docker as an integration.
Is there built‑in user authentication?
Only FUXA provides native authentication and role‑based access; Glances lacks this feature.
Do either tools require a paid license for enterprise use?
Both are free and open‑source; no paid tiers are mentioned.