Filament vs Gatsby
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Filament is an open‑source UI framework for Laravel that lets developers assemble admin interfaces, dashboards, and CRUD screens directly in PHP. It leverages Livewire to provide a server‑driven experience, eliminating the need for a separate frontend stack. Installed via Composer, Filament offers composable packages such as a table builder, form builder, notifications, widgets, and a full admin panel scaffold, enabling developers to create feature‑rich applications quickly and maintainably.
Gatsby is an open‑source framework that lets developers build blazing‑fast websites and apps using React, GraphQL, and modern web technologies. It compiles source files into static assets that can be deployed to any web host, delivering optimal performance and SEO out of the box. With a rich plugin ecosystem and seamless integration with headless CMSs and CI/CD platforms, Gatsby empowers agencies and developers to create scalable, secure, and highly maintainable web experiences while keeping the development workflow familiar and efficient.
- Fully integrates with Laravel and Livewire
- Zero‑code frontend; all UI built in PHP
- Highly modular and extensible packages
- Free and open‑source with active community
- Zero cost and open source
- Extensive plugin ecosystem
- Excellent performance out of the box
- Strong community and documentation
- Limited to Laravel ecosystem
- Relies on Livewire, which may add learning curve
- No official hosted SaaS version
- Steeper learning curve for GraphQL newcomers
- Build times can be long for very large sites without incremental builds
- Limited built‑in CMS; relies on external services
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Filament
View all →No alternatives listed yet. Browse similar tools →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataFilament is the go‑to free admin UI framework for Laravel developers, while Gatsby is a free React‑based static site generator with a massive plugin ecosystem.
Key differences
- •Technology stack: Filament is PHP/Laravel + Livewire; Gatsby is JavaScript/React + GraphQL.
- •Primary purpose: Filament builds admin panels and CRUD interfaces; Gatsby builds static or server‑rendered websites.
- •Ecosystem breadth: Gatsby offers >2,000 plugins and many third‑party integrations; Filament is focused on the Laravel ecosystem.
- •Learning curve: Filament requires Livewire knowledge; Gatsby requires GraphQL and React familiarity.
- •Deployment focus: Filament is a self‑hosted Laravel package; Gatsby targets static hosting platforms like Netlify and Vercel.
Pricing & value
Both are free, open‑source tools with community support.
Ease of use / learning curve
Filament offers zero‑code front‑end for Laravel devs, while Gatsby needs React and GraphQL knowledge.
Features & depth
Gatsby provides a GraphQL data layer, image processing, SSR, and 2,000+ plugins versus Filament’s admin‑panel focus.
Integrations & ecosystem
Gatsby lists key integrations (GitHub, Netlify, Contentful) and a large plugin marketplace; Filament is limited to Laravel.
Collaboration
Neither product specifies built‑in collaboration features.
Migration / lock‑in
Filament is tightly coupled to Laravel/Livewire, whereas Gatsby can be used with any static‑hosting service.
Choose Filament if…
Laravel developers who need a quick, code‑free admin dashboard within their existing Laravel app.
Choose Gatsby if…
Teams building high‑performance static or hybrid sites with React and want extensive plugin integrations.
Common questions
Can I use either tool for a public website?
Filament is designed for internal admin interfaces; Gatsby is built for public static or SSR websites.
Do I need to learn a new language to use them?
Filament uses PHP/Livewire; Gatsby requires JavaScript/React and GraphQL.
Is there any hosted SaaS version available?
Both are self‑hosted only; no official hosted SaaS offering is specified.